Geographic data quality: From assessment to exploitation

Cartographica

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 33-40

  Faïz, Sami ^a,b,c   Boursier, Patrice ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b Computer Science Research Laboratory ^*

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARC/INFO; DATA QUALITY; DECISION MAKING; GEOGRAPHICAL DATABASE; GIS; SPATIAL DATA;

EID: 0030368248     PISSN: 03177173     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/66R3-U1R0-1652-4Q06     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. ANDERSEN, O. 1995. Duality in the quality notion for GIS-DATA, GISDATA Specialist Meeting on Data Quality, Lisbon, Portugal.
2. ARMSTRONG, M. P., and P. J. DENSHAM. 1994. Toward the development of a conceptual framework for GIS-based collaborative spatial decision making, Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Gaithersburg, USA. 4-7.
3. BEARD, M. K., and W. M. MacKANESS. 1993. Visual access to data quality in geographic information systems, Cartographica 30/2,3: 37-45.
4. BERTIN, J. 1983. Semiology of Graphics: diagrams, networks, maps. University of Wisconsin Press.
5. BUTTENFIELD, B. P., and M. K. BEARD. 1991. Visualizing the quality of spatial information. Proceedings of Auto-Carto 8. 145-154.
6. CEN. 1994. Data Description: Quality, Draft of definitions. B. David, ed., Comité Européen de Coordination des Normes (CEN) / TC287 / WG2, # 4.
7. CHRISMAN, N. 1989. Modelling error in overlaid categorial maps. In Accuracy of Spatial Databases, M. F. Goodchild and S. Gopal, eds. London: Taylor and Francis. 21-34.
8. CNIG. 1993. Qualité des données géographiques échangées. Working Group Report, CNIG, Paris, France.
9. DAVID, B., L. RAYNAL, G. SCHORTER, and V. MANSART. 1993. GEO2: Why objects in a geographical DBMS? Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Large Spatial Databases (SSD'93), Singapore. 264-276.
10. FAÏZ, S., and P. BOURSIER. 1994. GeoQual: A data model for handling the quality of geographic information, Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Gaithersburg, USA. 107-114.
11. _. 1995. A model for handling and evaluating the quality of information in a geographical information system. Proceedings of the Joint European Conference on Geographical Information Systems, The Hague, The Netherlands. 175-180.
12. FAÏZ, S., J. P. NZALI, and P. BOURSIER. 1996. Representing quality depending on the user context. Proceedings of the Joint European Conference on Geographical Information Systems, Barcelona, Spain. 73-77.
13. MÜLLER, J. C. 1987. The concept of error in cartography. Cartographica 24/2: 1-15.
14. NCGIA. 1991. Visualization of Spatial Data Quality. Research Initiative 7 Report, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA), USA.