Message comprehensibility and persuasion: Effects of complex language in counterattitudinal appeals to laypeople

Social Cognition

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 317-337

  Hafer, Carolyn L ^a   Reynolds, Kelly L ^b   Obertynski, Monika A ^b  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030366204     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.1996.14.4.317     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alschuler, A. W. (1968). The prosecutor's role in plea bargaining. University of Chicago Law Review, 36, 50-112.
2. American Bar Association. (1993). ABA standards for criminal justice (3rd ed.), Washington, DC: Author.
3. Cacioppo, J. T., Claiborn, C. D., Petty, R. E., & Heesacker, M. (1991). A general framework for the study of attitude change in psychotherapy. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology: A health perspective (pp. 523-539). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought listing technique. In T. Merluzzi, C. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 309-342). New York: Guilford.
5. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Kao, C. F., & Rodriguez, R. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032-1043.
6. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
7. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source cred ibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460-473.
9. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
10. Christy, N. P. (1979). English is our second language. New England Journal of Medicine, 300, 979-981.
11. Cohen, S. A., & Doob, A. N. (1989). Public attitudes to plea bargaining. Criminal Law Quarterly, 32, 85-109.
12. Eagly, A. H. (1974). Comprehensibility of persuasive arguments as a determinant of opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 758-773.
13. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
14. Ferguson, G. A., & Roberts, D. W. (1974). Plea bargaining: Directions for Canadian reform. Canadian Bar Review, 52, 497-576.
15. Forsterlee, L., Horowitz, I. A., & Bourgeois, M. J. (1993). Juror competence in civil trials: Effects of preinstruction and evidence technicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 14-21.
16. Haugtvedt, C. P., & Petty, R. E. (1992). Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 308-319.
17. Haugtvedt, C. P., & Wegener, D. T. (1994). Message order effects in persuasion: An attitude strength perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 205-218.
18. Haugtvedt, C. P., Schumann, D. W., Schneier, W. L., & Warren, W. L. (1994). Advertising repetition and variation strategies: Implications for understanding attitude strength. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 176-189.
19. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Kratz, N. A., & Marshall, L. L. (1988). First impressions: Analog experiment on counselor behavior and gender. Representative Research in Social Psychology. 18, 41-50.
21. Law Reform Commission of Canada. (1989). Plea discussions and agreements (Working Paper No. 60). Ottawa, Canada: Author.
22. Maass, A., Brigham, J. C., & West, S. G. (1985). Testifying on eyewitness reliability: Expert advice is not always persuasive. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 207-229.
23. Mittelstaedt, M. (1993, July 8). Public not versed in justice Boyd says: Minister reacts to Holmolka ban. Globe and Mail, pp. A1, A4.
24. Musialowski, D. M. (1988). Perceptions of physicians as a function of medical jargon and subjects' authoritarianism. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 18, 3-14.
25. Neimeyer, G. J., Guy, J., & Metzler, A. (1989). Changing attitudes regarding the treatment of disordered eating: An application of the elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 70-86.
26. Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1993). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 117-154.
27. Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. (1993). Advisory committee to the attorney general on screening of criminal charges, resolution discussions and disclosure. Toronto, Canada: Author.
28. Pallak, S. S., Murroni, E., & Koch, J. (1983). Communicator attractiveness and expertise, emotional versus rational appeals, and persuasion. A heuristic versus systematic processing interpretation. Social Cognition, 2, 122-141.
29. Petty, R. E. (1994). Two routes to persuasion: State of the art. In G. d'Ydewalle, P. Eelen, & P. Bertelson (Eds.). International perspectives on psychological science (Vol. 2, pp. 229-247). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 69-81.
31. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). Orlando, CA: Academic Press.
32. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
33. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135-146.
34. Petty, R. E., Priester, J. R., & Wegener, D. T. (1994). Cognitive processes in persuasion. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 69-142). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive persuasion: Different roles for affect under high- and low-elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 5-20.
36. Ratneshwar, S., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Comprehension's role in persuasion: The case of its moderating effect on the persuasive impact of source cues. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 52-62.
37. Rich, R. F., & Sampson, R. J. (1990). Public perceptions of criminal justice policy: Does victimization make a difference? Violence and Victims, 5, 109-118.
38. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). The accessibility of source likability as a determinant of persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 19-25.
39. Verdun-Jones, S., & Hatch, A. (1988). Plea bargaining and sentencing guidelines. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
40. Verplanken, B. (1991). Persuasive communication of risk information: A test of cue versus message processing effects in a field experiment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 188-193.
41. Wood, W., & Kallgren, C. A. (1988). Communicator attributes and persuasion: Recipients' access to attitude-relevant information in memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 172-182.
42. Wood, W., Kallgren, C. A., & Preisler, R. M. (1985). Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message attributes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 73-85.
43. Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Psychology and the legal system (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
44. Wu, C., & Shaffer, D. R. (1987). Susceptibility to persuasive appeals as a function of source credibility and prior experience with the attitude object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 677-688.