The relationship between the Rescorla-Wagner associative model and the probabilistic joint model of causality

Psychologica Belgica

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 171-192

  Van Overwalle, Frank ^a  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030364832     PISSN: 00332879     EISSN: 2054670X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allen, L. G. (1993). Human contingency judgments: Rule based or associative? Psychological Bulletin, 114, 435-448.
2. Baker, A. G., Mercier, P., Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Frank, R., & Pan, M. (1993). Selective associations and causality judgments: Presence of a strong causal factor may reduce judgments of a weaker one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 414-432.
3. Chapman, G. B. (1991). Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 837-654.
4. Chapman, G B., & Robbins, S. J. (1990). Cue interaction in human contingency judgment. Memory and Cognition, 18, 537-545.
5. Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1990). A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 545-567.
6. Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365-382.
7. Estes, W. K., Campbell, J. A., Hatsopoulos N., & Hurwitz, J. B. (1989). Base-rate effects in category learning: A comparison of parallel network and memory storage-retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 556-571.
8. Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988a). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 227-247.
9. Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988b). Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 166-195.
10. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution in social psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 15, 192-238.
11. Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
12. McClelland, J. M., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1988). Explorations in parallel distributed processing: A handbook of models, programs and exercises. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
13. Nosofsky, R. M., Kruschke, J. K., & McKinley, S. C. (1992). Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 211-233.
14. Nosofsky, R. M., Kruschke, J. K., Palmeri, McKinley, S. C., & Glauthier, P. (1994). Comparing models of rule-based classification learning: A replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961). Memory and Cognition, 22, 352-369.
15. Pearce, J.M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607.
16. Rescorla, R. A. (1972). "Configural" conditioning in discrete-trial bar pressing. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 79, 307-317.
17. Rescorla, R. A. (1973). Evidence for "unique stimulus" account of Configurai conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 85, 331-338.
18. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-98). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
19. Shanks, D. R. (1991). Categorization by a connectionist network. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 433-443.
20. Shanks, D. R. (1993). Human instrumental learning: A critical review of data and theory. British Journal of Psychology, 84, 319-354.
21. Shanks, D. R., & Dickinson, A. (1987). Associative accounts of causality judgments. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 21, pp. 229-261). New York: Academic Press.
22. Van Hamme, L. J., & Wasserman, E. A. (1993). Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of manner of information presentation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 457-460.
23. Van Overwalle, F., & Heylighen, F. (1995). Relating covariation information to causal dimensions through principles of contrast and invariance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 435-455.
24. Van Overwalle, F. (1996). A test of the joint model of causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, in press.
25. Van Overwalle, F., & Van Rooy, D. (1996). Generalization beyond covariation: A comparison between probabilistic and connectionist models of causal attribution. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26. Van Rooy, D., & Van Overwalle, F. (1996). A connectionist account of discounting and augmentation in causal attribution. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27. Wasserman, E. A. (1990). Attribution of causality to common and distinctive elements of compound stimuli. Psychological Science, 1, 298-302.
28. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.