Longitudinal Research: Considerations for augmentative and alternative communication

AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 272-276

  Sevcik, Rose A ^a   Romski, Mary Ann ^a   Robinson, Bronwyn W ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC); Design; Longitudinal; Research

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; LINGUISTICS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION (ACC);

COMMUNICATION AIDS FOR NONVOCAL PERSONS;

EID: 0030360471     PISSN: 07434618     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07434619612331277728     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Baltes, P., & Nesselroade, J. (1979). History and rationale of longitudinal research. In J. Nesselroade & P. Baltes (Eds.), Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development (pp. 1-38). New York: Academic Press.
2. Bjorck-Akesson, E. (1990, August). Communicative interaction of young nonspeaking children and their parents. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Stockholm, Sweden.
3. Bjorck-Åkesson, E. (1992). Longitudinal research in AAC. In D. J. Gardner-Bonneau (Ed.), Methodological issues in research in augmentative and alternative communication: Proceedings of the Second ISAAC Research Symposium (pp. 80-86). Toronto, Canada: ISAAC.
4. Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Bruno, J., & Goehl, H. (1991). Comparison of picture and word association performance in adults and preliterate children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 70-79.
6. Crabtree, M., Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. (1990). Age and gender preferences for synthetic and natural speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 256-261.
7. Gulp, D. M. (1989). Developmental apraxia and augmentative or alternative communication - a case example. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 27-34.
8. DeRuyter, F., & Donoghue, K. A. (1989). Communication and traumatic brain injury: A case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 49-54.
9. Eilers, R., Cobo-Lewis, A., Vergara, K., Oller, D. K., & Friedman, N. (1996). A longitudinal evaluation of the speech perception capabilities of children using multichannel tactile vocoders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 518-533.
10. Gallagher, J., Ramey, C., Haskins, R., & Finkelstein, N. (1976). Use of longitudinal research in the study of child development. In T. Tjossem (Ed.), Intervention strategies for high risk infants and young children (pp. 161-186). Baltimore: University Park Press.
11. Goossens', C. (1989). Aided communication intervention before assessment: A case study of a child with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 14-26.
12. Gowen, J., Johnson-Martin, N., Goldman, B. D., & Hussey, B. (1992). Object play and exploration in children with and without disabilities: A longitudinal study. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 97, 21-38.
13. Iacono, T. (1992). A step back from small 'N' designs to view the total picture. In D. J. Gardner-Bonneau (Ed.), Methodological issues in research in augmentative and alternative communication: Proceedings of the Second ISAAC Research Symposium (pp. 12-16). Toronto, Canada: ISAAC.
14. Janson, C. (1981). Some problems of longitudinal research in the social sciences. In F. Schulsinger, S. Mednick, & J. Knop (Eds.), Longitudinal research: Methods and uses in the behavioral sciences (pp. 19-55). Boston: Martinus Nijhoof.
15. Light, J., Beesly, M., & Collier, B. (1988). Transition through multiple augmentative and alternative communication systems: A three-year case study of a head-injured adolescent. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 2-14.
16. Locke, P. A., & Mirenda, P. (1988). A computer-supported communication approach for a child with severe communication, visual, and cognitive impairments: A case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 15-22.
17. MacWhinney, B., & Snow, C. (1985). The Child Language Data Exchange System. Journal of Child Language, 12, 271-296.
18. McReynolds, L., & Kearns, K. (1983). Single subject experimental designs in communication disorders. Baltimore: University Park Press.
19. Porter, P. B. (1989). Intervention in end stage of multiple sclerosis: A case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 125-127.
20. Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1992a). In D. J. Gardner- Bonneau (Ed.), Methodological issues in research in augmentative and alternative communication: Proceedings of the Second ISAAC Research Symposium (pp. 87-92). Toronto, Canada: ISAAC.
21. Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1992b). Developing augmented language in children with severe mental retardation. In S. Warren & J. Reichle (Eds.), Causes and effects in communication and language intervention (pp. 113-130). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
22. Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
23. Rowland, C. (1990). Communication in the classroom for childrei with dual sensory impairments: Studies of teacher and child behavior. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 262-274.
24. Rowland, C. (1992). Small 'N' studies: The case for more and better data. In D. J. Gardner-Bonneau (Ed.), Methodological issues in research in augmentative and alternative communication Proceedings of the Second ISAAC Research Symposium (pp. 17-22). Toronto, Canada: ISAAC.
25. Schutz-Muehling, L. D., & Beukelman, D. R. (1990). An augmentative and alternative writing system for a college student with fibrositis: A case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 250-254.
26. Schweigert, P., & Rowland, C. (1992). Early communication and microtechnology: Instructional sequence and case studies of children with severe multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 273-286.
27. Thorley, B., Ward, J., Binepal, T., & Dolan, K. (1991). Communicating with printed words to augment signing: Case study of a severely disabled deaf-blind child. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 80-87.