Comparison of two different approaches to calibrate an energy-dispersive x-ray fluorescence spectrometer for the analysis of aerosol-loaded filters

Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry

Volumn 355, Issue 3-4, 1996, Pages 379-381

  Schafer C ^a   Haupt, O ^a   Dannecker, W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSOLS; CALIBRATION; SAMPLING;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DETECTION LIMIT; DISPERSIVE SPECTROMETRY; ENERGY DISPERSION; MEMBRANE FILTER; MULTICOMPONENT ANALYSIS; X RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0030356629     PISSN: 09370633     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Hahn-Weinheimer P, Hirner A, Weber-Diefenbach K (1984) Grundlagen und praktische Anwendungen der Röntgenfluoreszenzanalyse. Vieweg, Braunschweig Wiesbaden.
2. Eberspächer H. Schreiber H (1976) X-Ray Spectrom, 5:49-54
3. VDI-Handbuch Reinhaltung der Luft (1981) Band 4, Richtlinie 2267, Blatt 11 und 12
4. Pötzl K, Kanter HJ (1980) Vortragsreferat 8th Conf Aerosols in Science, Medicine and Technology, Wien, pp 310-315
5. Haupt O, Klaue B, Schäfer C, Dannecker W (1995) X-Ray Spectrom 24:267-275
6. Steiger M (1991) Dissertation, University of Hamburg
7. Haupt O, Schäfer C, Strauß S, Dannecker W (1996) Fresenius J Anal Chem 355: this issue