-
3
-
-
0021086242
-
Personal versus telephone surveys for collecting household health data at the local level
-
Weeks MF, Kulka RA, Lessler JT, Whitmore RW. Personal versus telephone surveys for collecting household health data at the local level. Am J Public Health 1983;73(12):1389-1394.
-
(1983)
Am J Public Health
, vol.73
, Issue.12
, pp. 1389-1394
-
-
Weeks, M.F.1
Kulka, R.A.2
Lessler, J.T.3
Whitmore, R.W.4
-
5
-
-
0018412460
-
A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys
-
Siemiatycki J. A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys. Am J Public Health, 1979;69(3):238-245.
-
(1979)
Am J Public Health
, vol.69
, Issue.3
, pp. 238-245
-
-
Siemiatycki, J.1
-
6
-
-
0023946383
-
Two one-step methods for household screening and interviewing using random digit dialing
-
Harlow BL, Davis S. Two one-step methods for household screening and interviewing using random digit dialing. Am J Epidemiol 1988;127(4):857-863.
-
(1988)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.127
, Issue.4
, pp. 857-863
-
-
Harlow, B.L.1
Davis, S.2
-
8
-
-
0028339999
-
Telephone sampling in epidemiologic research: To reap the benefits, avoid the pitfalls
-
Potthoff RF. Telephone sampling in epidemiologic research: to reap the benefits, avoid the pitfalls. Am J Epidemiol 1994;139(10):967-978.
-
(1994)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.139
, Issue.10
, pp. 967-978
-
-
Potthoff, R.F.1
-
9
-
-
0003674844
-
-
New York, NY John Wiley & Sons
-
Groves RM, Biemer PP, Lyberg LE, Massey JT, Nichols II WL, et al. (eds) Telephone Survey Methodology. New York, NY John Wiley & Sons, 1988.
-
(1988)
Telephone Survey Methodology
-
-
Groves, R.M.1
Biemer, P.P.2
Lyberg, L.E.3
Massey, J.T.4
Nichols II, W.L.5
-
10
-
-
0021170052
-
Nonresponse bias and early versus all respondents in mail and telephone surveys
-
Siemiatycki J, Campbell S. Nonresponse bias and early versus all respondents in mail and telephone surveys. Am J Epidemiol 1984;120{2):291-314.
-
(1984)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.120
, Issue.2
, pp. 291-314
-
-
Siemiatycki, J.1
Campbell, S.2
-
11
-
-
0010034991
-
A brief review of sampling methods for research in health education and health promotion
-
Dignan MB. A brief review of sampling methods for research in health education and health promotion. Health Values 1992;16(3):58-61.
-
(1992)
Health Values
, vol.16
, Issue.3
, pp. 58-61
-
-
Dignan, M.B.1
-
12
-
-
0025649729
-
Interviewer bias: How it affects survey research
-
Salazar MK. Interviewer bias: How it affects survey research. AAOHN Journal 1990;38(12):567-572.
-
(1990)
AAOHN Journal
, vol.38
, Issue.12
, pp. 567-572
-
-
Salazar, M.K.1
-
14
-
-
0006162510
-
The Dillman total design method: A sure-fire way to get high survey return rates
-
Hoddinott SN, Bass MJ. The Dillman total design method: a sure-fire way to get high survey return rates. Can Fam Physician 1986;32:2366-2368.
-
(1986)
Can Fam Physician
, vol.32
, pp. 2366-2368
-
-
Hoddinott, S.N.1
Bass, M.J.2
-
15
-
-
0027438413
-
Randomized trial of use of a monetary incentive and a reminder card to increase response rate to a mailed health survey
-
Pernager TV, Etter J, Rougemont A. Randomized trial of use of a monetary incentive and a reminder card to increase response rate to a mailed health survey. Am J Epidemiol 1993;138(9):714-722.
-
(1993)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.138
, Issue.9
, pp. 714-722
-
-
Pernager, T.V.1
Etter, J.2
Rougemont, A.3
-
16
-
-
0025208271
-
Does anonymity increase response rate in postal questionnaire surveys about sensitive subjects? a randomized trial
-
Campbell MJ, Waters WE. Does anonymity increase response rate in postal questionnaire surveys about sensitive subjects? a randomized trial. J Epid Comm Health 1990;44(1):75-76.
-
(1990)
J Epid Comm Health
, vol.44
, Issue.1
, pp. 75-76
-
-
Campbell, M.J.1
Waters, W.E.2
-
17
-
-
0027289014
-
Telephone answering machines: The influence of leaving messages on telephone interviewing response rates
-
Harlow BL, Crea EC, East MA, Olesin B, Fraer CJ, et al. Telephone answering machines: the influence of leaving messages on telephone interviewing response rates. Epidemiology 1993;4(4):380-383.
-
(1993)
Epidemiology
, vol.4
, Issue.4
, pp. 380-383
-
-
Harlow, B.L.1
Crea, E.C.2
Ma, E.3
Olesin, B.4
Fraer, C.J.5
-
18
-
-
0023261712
-
A comparison of respondents to mailed questionnaires and telephone interviews in a mixed mode health survey
-
Rambilla DJ, McKinlay SM. A comparison of respondents to mailed questionnaires and telephone interviews in a mixed mode health survey. Am J Epidemiol 1987;126(5):962-971.
-
(1987)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.126
, Issue.5
, pp. 962-971
-
-
Rambilla, D.J.1
McKinlay, S.M.2
-
19
-
-
0021039364
-
Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face-to-face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug, and tobacco use
-
Skinner HA, Allen BA. Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face-to-face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug, and tobacco use. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983;51(2):267-275.
-
(1983)
J Consult Clin Psychol
, vol.51
, Issue.2
, pp. 267-275
-
-
Skinner, H.A.1
Allen, B.A.2
|