Effect of sucralose – alone or bulked with maltodextrin and/or dextrose – on plaque pH in humans

Caries Research

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 439-444

  Meyerowitz, C ^a   Syrrakou, E P ^a   Raubertasc, R F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental plaque pH; Maltodextrins; Sucralose; Sweeteners; Tea

Indexed keywords

DRUG DERIVATIVE; GLUCOSE; MALTODEXTRIN; POLYSACCHARIDE; SUCROSE; SWEETENING AGENT; TRICHLOROSUCROSE;

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PH; SUGAR INTAKE; TEA; TOOTH PLAQUE;

ADULT; AREA UNDER CURVE; DENTAL PLAQUE; DIETARY SUCROSE; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; GLUCOSE; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; POLYSACCHARIDES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SUCROSE; SWEETENING AGENTS; TEA;

EID: 0030347001     PISSN: 00086568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000262357     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bowen WH: Role of carbohydrates in dental caries; in Shaw JH. Roussos GG (eds): Sweeteners and dental caries. Washington. Information Retrieval, 1978, pp 147-152.
2. Bowen WH, Pearson SK: The effects of sucralose. xylitol, and sorbitol on rcmincralization of caries lesions in rats. J Dent Res 1992:71:1166-1168.
3. Bowen WH, Young DA. Pearson SK: The effects of sucralose on coronal and root-surface caries. J Dent Res 1990a;69:1458-1487.
4. Bowen WH. Pearson SK. Falany JL: Influence of sweetening agents in solution on dental caries in desalivated rats. Arch Oral Biol 1990b;35:839-844.
5. Burt BA. Ismail AL: Diet, nutrition, and food cario-gcnicity. J Dent Res 1986;65(specIss): 1475- 1484.
6. Edgar WM. Geddcs DAM: Plaque acidity models for cariogenicity testing, Some theoretical and practical observations, J Dent Res 1986:65: (specIss): 1498 1502.
7. Gallacher HC, Pearce EIF: The sugar alcohols. Non-cariogenic sweeteners. NZ Dent J 1977; 73:200-206.
8. Goldsmith LA: Sucralose salety evaluation, Toxicologist 1991;vol II:267.
9. Grenby Til: Update on low-calorie sweeteners to benefit dental health. Int Dent J 1991:41:217-224.
10. Grotz VL, Kille JW: Sucralose, a substituted disaccharide that tastes sweet but is not treated as a carbohydrate in vivo. Toxicologist 1992:12:146.
11. Harper C. Abelson DC, Jensen ME: Human plaque acidity models. J Dent Res 1986;65(speciss): 1503-1510.
12. Health and Welfare Canada, Canada Gazette. Part II, Sept 25.1991.
13. Hough E. Khan R: Intensification of sweetness. Trends Biochcm Sci 1978;3:61-63.
14. Ikcda T: Sugar substitutes: Reasons and indications for their use. Int Dent J 1982;32:33-43.
15. Jenkins GN. Edgar WM. Ferguson DB: The distribution and metabolic effects of human plaque fluorine. Arch Oral Biol 1969;14:105-109.
16. Jensen ME: The effect sodium fluoride on human interproximal plaque pi I responses to 10% sucrose (abstract 14), Caries Res 1985:19:157.
17. Lingstrom P, Imfcld T, Birkhed D: Comparison of three different methods for measurement of plaque pH in humans after consumption of soft bread and potato chips. J Dent Res 1993:72: 865-870.
18. Makincn KK: The role of sucrose and other sugars in the development of dental caries: A review. Int Dent J 1972;22:363-386.
19. Miller GA: Sucralose; in O'Brien Nabors L. Geraldi RC (eds): Alternative sweeteners, ed2. New York, Dekkcr, 1991.
20. Neff D: Acid production from different carbohydrate sources in human plaque in situ. Caries Res 1967:1:78-87.
21. Park K, Schemehorn B. Garcia N, Stookey G. Hov-liaras C. Barnett M: Effect of sucralose chewing gum on plaque pH response (abstract 2347). J Dent Res 1993:72:397.
22. Rosen S, Elvis-Lewis M, Beck FM, Beck EX: Anti-cariogenic effect of tea in rats. J Dent Res 1984; 63:658-660.
23. Rugg-Gunn AJ. Edgar WM: Sugar and dental caries: A review of the evidence. Community Dent Health 1984:85:92.
24. Schachtele CF, Jensen ME: Comparison of methods for monitoring changes in pH of human dental plaque. J Dent Res 1982;61:1117-1125.
25. Shields WF, Miihlemann HR: Simultaneous pH and fluoride telemetry. A supplemental report. Helv Odontol Acta 1975;19:72-75.
26. Speiers RL: Correlations between the concentrations of fluoride and some other constituents in tea infusions and their possible dental caries-preventive effect. Arch Oral Biol 1983:28:471-475.
27. Steinberg LM, Odusola F. Mandel ID: Plaque pH response vs. sucralosc/carbohydratc combinations (abstract 1310). J Dent Res 1992:71:269.
28. Stephan RM: Changes in hydrogen-ion concentration on tooth surfaces and in carious lesions. J Am Dent ASSOC 1940;27:718-723.
29. Taves DR: Separation of fluoride by rapid diffusion using hcxamethyldisiloxane. Talanta 1968;15: 969-974.
30. Yeomans L: Sucralose -a unique new sweetener. Properties, applications and future. Int Sugar J 1992:94(1123):70A.
31. Young DA, Bowen WH: The influence of sucralose on bacterial metabolism. J Dent Res 1990:69: 1480-1484.
32. WHO: Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. Thirty seventh report of the joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1991:806.
33. Ziesenitz SC, Siebert G: The metabolism and utilization of polyols and other bulk sweeteners compared with sugar; in Grenby TH (ed): Developments in Sweeteners-3. London, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, 1987, pp 140.