Root surface removal with diamond-coated ultrasonic instruments: An in vitro and SEM study

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 67, Issue 12, 1996, Pages 1281-1287

  Lavespere, J Eric ^a   Yukna, Raymond A ^a,c   Rice, David A ^b   LeBlanc, Denis M ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b Tulane University   (United States)

^c LSU Dental School   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental calculus prevention and control; Dental instruments; Dental plaque prevention and control; Planing instrumentation; Tooth root

Indexed keywords

DIAMOND;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH ROOT; ULTRASOUND THERAPY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DIAMOND; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROOT PLANING; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH ROOT; ULTRASONIC THERAPY;

EID: 0030346268     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.1996.67.12.1281     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Barnes JE, Schaffer EM. Subgingival root planing: A comparison of files, hoes, and curettes. J Periodontol 1960;31:300-303.
2. Schaffer EM. Objective evaluation of ultrasonic versus hand instrumentation in periodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1964;8:165-174.
3. Kerry GJ. Roughness of root surfaces after the use of ultrasonic instruments and hand curettes. J Periodontol 1967;38:340-346.
4. Aleo JJ, DeRenzis FA, Farber PA. In vitro attachment of human gingival fibroblasts to root surfaces. J Periodontol 1975;46:639-645.
5. Lie T, Meyer K. Calculus removal and loss of tooth substance in response to different periodontal instruments: A scanning electron microscope study. J Clin Periodontol 1977;4:250-262.
6. Ruben M, Shapiro A. An analysis of root surface changes in periodontal disease - A review. J Periodontol 1978;49:89-91.
7. Waerhaug J. Healing of the dentinoenamel junction following subgingival plaque control II. As observed on extracted teeth. J Periodontol 1978;49:119-134.
8. Aleo JJ, Vandersall DC. Cementum. Recent concepts related to periodontal disease therapy. Dent Clin North Am 1980;24:627-650.
9. Fine DH, Morris ML, Tabak L, Cole LD. Preliminary characterization of material eluted from the roots of periodontally diseased teeth. J Periodont Res 1980;15:10-19.
10. Daly CG, Seymour GJ, Kieser JB, Corbet EF. Histological assessment of periodontally involved cementum. J Clin Periodontol 1982;9:266-274.
11. O'Leary T, Kafrawy A. Total cementum removal: A realistic objective? J Periodontol 1983;54:221-226.
12. O'Leary TJ. The impact of research on scaling and root planing. J Periodontol 1986;57:69-75.
13. McCoy SA, Creamer HR, Kawanami M, Adams DF. The concentration of lipopolysaccharide on individual root surfaces at varying times following in vivo root planing. J Periodontol 1987;58:393-399.
14. Jotikasthira NE, Lie T, Leknes KN. Comparative in vitro studies of sonic, ultrasonic and reciprocating scaling instruments. J Clin Periodontol 1992;19:560-569.
15. Lai H, O'Leary TJ, Kafrawy AH. The effect of different treatment modalities on the connective issue attachment. J Periodontol 1986;57:604-612.
16. Moore J, Wilson M, Kieser JB. The distribution of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (endotoxin) in relation to periodontally involved root surfaces. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:748-751.
17. Hughes FJ, Smales FC. Immunohistochemical investigation of the presence and distribution of cementum associated lipopolysaccharides in periodontal disease. J Periodont Res 1986;21:660-667.
18. Nyman S, Sarhed G, Ericsson I, Gottlow J, Karring T. Role of "diseased" root cementum in healing following treatment of periodontal disease. An experimental study of the dog. J Periodont Res 1986;21: 496-503.
19. Blomlöf L, Lindskog S, Appelgren R, Jonsson B, Weintraub H, Hammarstrom L. New attachment in monkeys with experimental periodontitis with and without removal of the cementum. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:136-143.
20. Nyman S, Westfelt E, Sarhed G, Karring T. Role of "diseased" root cementum in healing following treatment of periodontal disease. A clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:464-468.
21. Smart GJ, Wilson M, Davies EH, Kleser JB. The assessment of ultrasonic root surface debridement by determination of residual endotoxin levels. J Clin Periodontol 1990;17:174-178.
22. Chiew SYT, Wilson M, Davies EH, Kleser JB. Assessment of ultrasonic debridement of calculus-associated periodontally-involved root surfaces by the limulus amoebocyte lysate assay. An in vitro study. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:240-244.
23. Yukna RA. Clinical human comparison of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membrane and freeze-dried dura mater allografts for guided tissue regeneration of lost periodontal support. I. Mandibular molar class II furcations. J Periodontol 1992;63:431-440.
24. Trombelli L, Schincaglia G, Checchi L, Calura G. Combined guided tissue regeneration, root conditioning, and fibrin-fibronectin system application in the treatment of gingival recession. J Periodontol 1994;65:796-803.
25. Riffle AB. The cementum during curettage. J Periodontol 1952;23: 170-177.
26. Allen EF, Rhoads RJ. Effect of high speed periodontal instruments on the tooth surface. J Periodontol 1963;34:352-356.
27. Belting CM, Spjut PJ. Effects of high speed periodontal instruments on the root surface during subgingival calculus removal. J Am Dent Assoc 1964;69:578-584.
28. Clark SM, Grupe HE, Mahler DB. The effect of ultrasonic instrumentation on root surfaces. J Periodontol 1968;39:135-142.
29. Wilkinson RF, Maybury JE. Scanning electron microscopy of the root surface following instrumentation. J Periodontol 1973;44:559-562.
30. Van Volkinburg JW, Green E, Armitage GC. The nature of root surfaces after curette, cavitron and alpha-sonic instrumentation. J Periodont Res 1976;11:374-381.
31. Garrett JS. Root planing: A perspective. J Periodontol 1977;48:553-557.
32. Jones WA, O'Leary TJ. The effectiveness of in vivo root planing in the removal of bacterial endotoxin from the roots of periodontally involved teeth. J Periodontol 1978;49:337-342.
33. D'Silva IV, Nayak RP, Cherian KM, Mulky MJ. An evaluation of the root topography following periodontal instrumentation - A scanning electron microscopic study. J Periodontol 1979;50:283-290.
34. Lie T, Leknes K. Evaluation of the effect on the root surface of air turbine scaler and ultrasonic instrumentation. J Periodontol 1985;56: 522-531.
35. Borghetti A, Mattout P, Mattout C. How much root planing is necessary to remove the cementum from the root surface? Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1987;7(4):23-29.
36. Coldiron NR, Yukna RA, Weir J, Caudill RF. A quantitative study of cementum removal with hand curettes. J Periodontol 1990;61: 293-299.
37. Zappa U, Smith B, Simiona C, Graft H, Case D, Kim W. Root surface removal by scaling and root planing. J Periodontol 1991;62: 750-754.
38. Ritz L, Hefti AF, Rateitschak KH. An in vitro investigation on the loss of root substance in scaling with various instruments. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:643-647.
39. Moskow BS, Bressman E. Cemental response to ultrasonic and hand instrumentation. J Am Dent Assoc 1964;68:698-703.
40. Ellman IA. Comparative safety of the rotosonic scaler and the curet. J Periodontol 1964;35:410-415.
41. Pameijer CH, Stallard RE, Hiep N. Surface characteristics of teeth following periodontal instrumentation. A scanning electron microscope study. J Periodontol 1972;43:628-633.
42. Jones SJ, Lozdan J, Boyde A. Tooth surfaces treated in situ with periodontal instruments. Scanning electron microscopic studies. Brit Dent J 1972;132:57-64.
43. Rosenberg RR, Ash MM. The effect of root roughness on plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation. J Periodontol 1974;45: 146-150.
44. Swan RW. Dimensional changes in a tooth root incident to various polishing and planing procedures. Dent Hygiene 197;53:17-19.
45. Hunter RK, O'Leary TJ, Kafrawy AH. The effectiveness of hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation in open flap root planing. J Periodontol 1984;55:697-703.
46. Bye FL, Ghilzon RS, Caffesse RG. Root surface roughness after the use of different modes of instrumentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1986;6(5):36-41.
47. Berkstein S, Reiff RL, McKinney JF, Killoy WJ. Supragingival root surface removal during maintenance procedures utilizing an air powder abrasive system or hand scaling. J Periodontol 1987;58:327-329.
48. Bjorn H, Lindhe J. The influence of periodontal instruments on the tooth surface. A methodological study. Odont Revy 1962;13:355-369.
49. Khatiblou FA, Ghodssi A. Root surface smoothness or roughness in periodontal treatment. A clinical study. J Periodontol 1983;54:365-367.
50. Steed AM, Scott JB, Yukna RA. Speed of calculus removal in furcation with ultrasonic diamond inserts. J Dent Res 1995;74 (Spec. Issue):132(Abstr. 962).
51. Yukna RA, Scott JB, Aichelmann-Reidy ME, LeBlanc DM, Mayer ET. Clinical evaluation of the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal with diamond-coated ultrasonic instruments. J Periodontol 1997; in press.