|
Volumn 3, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 12-17
|
Can reliable Down's syndrome detection rates be determined from prenatal screening intervention trials?
|
Author keywords
Down's syndrome; Human chorionic gonadotrophin; Intervention trials; Prenatal screening; Risk
|
Indexed keywords
ALPHA FETOPROTEIN;
CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN;
ESTRIOL;
ADULT;
AGE DISTRIBUTION;
AMNIOCENTESIS;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
DOWN SYNDROME;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;
MATERNAL AGE;
META ANALYSIS;
METHODOLOGY;
PREGNANCY;
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;
RISK FACTOR;
SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY;
STANDARD;
STATISTICAL MODEL;
STATISTICS;
ADULT;
AGE DISTRIBUTION;
ALPHA-FETOPROTEINS;
AMNIOCENTESIS;
CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN;
DOWN SYNDROME;
ESTRIOL;
FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MATERNAL AGE;
MODELS, STATISTICAL;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, SECOND;
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;
RISK FACTORS;
|
EID: 0030345675
PISSN: 09691413
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1177/096914139600300105 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (30)
|
References (2)
|