The extent of enamel surface fractures. A quantitative comparison of thermally debonded ceramic and mechanically debonded metal brackets by energy dispersive micro- and image-analysis

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 655-662

  Stratmann, Udo ^a   Schaarschmidt, K ^a   Wegener, H ^a   Ehmer, U ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; CALCIUM; DENTAL ALLOY; PHOSPHORUS;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL DEBONDING; ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS; ENAMEL; HEAT; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH FRACTURE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADHESIVES; ADOLESCENT; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CALCIUM; CERAMICS; CHILD; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS; HEAT; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; PHOSPHORUS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH FRACTURES;

EID: 0030341677     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/18.6.655     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abendroth R, Bößmann K 1979 Variation der Ätzmuster an Schmelzoberflächen nach Behandlung mit verschiedenen Ätzmitteln. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 34: 181-184
2. Bäzner B, Ettwein K H, Röhlcke F,. Sernetz F 1991 In-vitro-Untersuchungen zum thermischen Debonding von Keramikbrackets. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 52: 322-333
3. Bishara S E, Trulove T S 1990 Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part II. Findings and clinical implications. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 98: 263-273
4. Bowen R L, Rodriguez M S 1962 Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. Journal of the American Dental Association 64: 378-387
5. Diedrich P 1981 Enamel alterations from bracket bonding and debonding: a study with the scanning electron microscope. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 79: 500-522
6. Diedrich P 1983 Bracketadhäsivtechnik. Karl Hanser Verlag, München
7. Douglas J B 1989 Enamel wear caused by ceramic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 95: 96-98
8. Fischer-Brandies H, Kremers L, Reicheneder C, Kluge G, Häusler K 1993 Über die Schmelzschädigung in Abhängigkeit von der Methode der Bracketentfernung. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 54: 64-70
9. Gerkhardt K D, Hohmann W, Kocjancic B, Schopf P M 1988 Elektrothermische Bracketentfernung durch Erweichung des Klebers mittels Hochstromimpuls. Praktische Kieferorthopädie 2: 145-148
10. Hall T A 1971 Microprobe assay of chemical elements. In: Physical techniques in biological research. Vol IA. Academic Press, New York, pp 157-275
11. Hertrich K, Hirschfelder U 1990 Erfahrungen erwachsener Patienten mit ihrer kieferorthopädischen Behandlung. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 51: 44-48
12. Joseph V P, Rossouw E 1990 The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 97: 121-125
13. Jost-Brinkmann P G, Dürr W, Miethke R 1989 Thermodebonding von Metall- und Keramikbrackets. Praktische Kieferorthopädie 3: 249-256
14. Kusy R P 1988 Morphology of polycrystalline alumina brackets and its relationship to fracture toughness and strength. Angle Orthodontist 58: 197-203
15. Maskeroni A J, Meyers C E, Lorton L 1990 Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of bond strength with polyacrylic acid and phosphoric acid enamel conditioning. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 97: 168-175
16. Newesely H B, Rossiwall I 1989 Schmelzabrasionen und Schmelzausrisse bei Keramikbrackets. Informationen in Orthodontie und Kieferorthopädie 21: 577-594
17. Ødegaard J, Segner D 1988 Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracket. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 94: 201-206
18. Rueggerberg F A, Lockwood P 1990 Thermal debracketing of orthodontic resins. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 98: 56-65
19. Ruppenthal T, Baumann M A 1992 Zur Temperaturerhöhung in der Zahnpulpa während elektrothermischer Abnahme von Keramikbrackets Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 53: 111-116
20. Ruppenthal T, Stratmann U, Sergl H G, Czech D 1992 Elementanalytische und quantitativ-morphometrische Bestimmung von Kunststoffresten und Schmelzausrissen nach der Abnahme von Metallbrackets. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 53: 99-105
21. Sander F G, Weinrich A 1989 Sind Keramikbrackets ein Fortschritt für unsere Patienten? Zahnärztliche Mitteilungen 79: 2730-2740
22. Scott G E 1988 Fracture toughness and surface cracks-the key to understanding ceramic brackets. Angle Orthodontist 58: 5-8
23. Sheridan J J, Brawley G, Hastings J 1986 Electrothermal debracketing. Part I. An in vitro study. American Journal of Orthodontics 89: 21-27
24. Zach L., Cohen G 1965 Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surgery 19: 515-530