Choice and instrumental delivery

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 103, Issue 12, 1996, Pages 1270-

  Johanson, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH STAFFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DELIVERY; FEMALE; FORCEPS; HUMAN; NOTE; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VACUUM EXTRACTION; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE;

DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; OBSTETRICAL FORCEPS; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; VACUUM EXTRACTION, OBSTETRICAL; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0030341132     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09646.x     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. Drife JO. Choice and instrumental delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 608–611.
2. Glazener CMA, Abdalla M, Naji P, Stroud S, Templeton A, Russell IT. Postnatal maternal morbidity: extent, causes, prevention and treat ment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102:282–287.
3. Meniru GI. An analysis of recent trends in vacuum extraction and forceps delivery in the United Kingdom. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 168–170.
4. O'Driscoll K, Meagher D, MacDonald D, Geoghegan F. Traumatic intracranial haemorrhage in firstborn infants and delivery with Obstet ric forceps. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1981; 88: 577–581.
5. Johanson RB. Vacuum extraction vs forceps delivery. The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Database 1995; (1).
6. Hillier CEM, Johanson RB. Worldwide survey of assisted vaginal delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1994; 41: 109–114.
7. Hibbard BM, McKenna DM. The obstetric forceps-are we using the appropriate tools Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 91: 374–380.
8. Laufe LE. A new divergent outlet forceps. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968; 101: 509–512.