Student Interest in Activities in a Secondary Physical Education Curriculum: An Analysis of Student Subjectivity

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 424-432

  Chen, Ang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Curriculum; Physical activity; Physical education

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CLASSIFICATION; CURRICULUM; FEMALE; FITNESS; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSICAL EDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STUDENT;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; CURRICULUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR SKILLS; PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING; PHYSICAL FITNESS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STUDENTS;

EID: 0030340851     PISSN: 02701367     EISSN: 21683824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1996.10607974     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2. Browne, J. (1992). Reasons for the selection or nonselection of physical education studies by year 12 girls. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 402–410.
3. Burke, D. J. (1995). Connecting content and motivation: Education’s missing link. Peabody Journal of Education, 70, 66–81.
4. Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43–70). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
5. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think (Rev. ed.). New York: Heath.
6. Ennis, C. D. (1995). Teachers’ responses to noncompliant students: The realities and consequences of a negotiated curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 445–460.
7. Godin, G. (1994). Social-cognitive models. In R. K Dishman (Ed.), Advances in Exercise Adherence. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
8. Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1992). Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 215–238). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
9. Jewett, A. E., Bain, L. L., & Ennis, C. D. (1995). The curriculum process in physical education (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
10. Locke, L. F. (1992). Changing secondary school physical education. Quest, 44, 361–372.
11. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.
12. Kenyon, G. S. (1968). A conceptual model for characterizing physical activity. The Research Quarterly, 39, 96–105.
13. Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 1–26). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
14. McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (1988). Qmethodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424–436.
16. National Association for Sport and Physical Education (1995). Moving into the future: National standards for physical education. St. Louis: Mosby.
17. Prenzel, M. (1992). The selective persistence of interest. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 71–98). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
18. Reeve, J. (1989). The interest-enjoyment distinction in intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 13, 83–103.
19. Shavelson, R.J. (1988). Statistical reasoning for the behavioral sciences. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
21. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.