Learning from broken rules: Individualism, bureaucracy, and ethics

Ethics and Behavior

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 307-320

  Rossiter, Amy ^a   Walsh Bowers, Richard ^b   Prilleltensky, Isaac ^b  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Applied ethics; Counseling bureaucracies

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030337011     PISSN: 10508422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327019eb0604_2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brown, L. (1997). Ethics in psychology: Cui bono [Who benefits from it]? In D. Fox & I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction, (pp. 51-67). London: Sage.
2. Chambers, S. (1995). Feminist discourse/practical discourse. In J. Meehan (Ed.), Feminists read Habermas (pp. 163-179). New York: Routledge.
3. Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
4. Du Toit, A. (1993). The micro-politics of paternalism: The discourses of management and resistance on South African fruit and wine farms. Journal of Southern African Studies, 19(2), 314-336.
5. Ferguson, K. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
6. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
7. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon.
8. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777-789.
9. Fox, D., & Prilleltensky, I. (Eds.). (1997). Critical psychology: An introduction. London: Sage.
10. Gartrell, N. (Ed.). (1994). Bringing ethics alive: Feminist ethics in psychotherapy practice. Binghampton, NY: Harrington Park Press.
11. Habermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action (Thomas McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
12. Habermas, J. (1990). Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification. In S. Benhabib and F. Dallmayr (Eds.), The communicative ethics controversy (pp. 60-110). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Habermas, J. (1992). The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures (Frederick Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Heald, S. (in press). Events without witness: Living/teaching differences in the progressivist and paternalist university. Curriculum Studies.
15. Levy, C. S. (1993). Social work ethics on the line. New York: Haworth.
16. Lerman, H., & Porter, N. (Eds.). Feminist ethics in psychotherapy. New York: Springer.
17. Loewenberg, F. M., & Dolgoff, R. (1992). Ethical decisions for social work practice (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
18. Prilleltensky, I. (1994). The morals and politics of psychology: Psychological discourse and the status quo. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
19. Prilleltensky, I., & Gonick, L. (1996). Politics change, oppression remains: On the psychology and politics of oppression. Political Psychology. 17(1), 127-148.
20. Rhodes, M. L. (1986). Ethical dilemmas in social work practice. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
21. Scheman, N. (1981). Individualism and the objects of psychology. In S. Harding & M. Hintikka (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology and the philosophy of science (pp. 226-244). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
22. Smircich, L. (1983). Studying organizations as cultures. In G. Morgan (Ed.), Beyond method: Strategies for social research (pp. 160-171). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23. Spelman. E. (1978). On treating persons as persons. Ethics, 88, 150-161.
24. Woody, J. D. (1990). Resolving ethical concerns in clinical practice: Toward a pragmatic model. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16(2), 133-150.