Delayed visual feedback while learning to track a moving target

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 416-423

  Carnahan, Heather ^a   Hall, Craig ^b   Lee, Timothy D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Feedback; Learning; Vision

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME; VISION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MOTOR SKILLS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME FACTORS; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); VISION;

EID: 0030332993     PISSN: 02701367     EISSN: 21683824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1996.10607973     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bamford, R. B., & Marteniuk, R. G. (1988). Visual feedback, movement learning and the representation of movement. Human Movement Science, 7, 1–26.
2. Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Morris, C. D., & Stein, B. S. (1979). Some general constraints on learning and memory research. In L. S. Cermak 8c F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 331–354). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Carnahan, H., Vandervoort, A. A., & Swanson, L. R. (1993). The influence of aging on motor learning. In G. Stelmach & V. Homberg (Eds.), Sensorimotor impairments in the elderly (pp. 41–56) Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
4. Elliott, D., & Allard, F. (1985). The utilization of visual feedback information during rapid pointing movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 407–425.
5. Gessaroli, M. E., & Schutz, R. W. (1983). Variable error: Vari-ance-covariance heterogeneity, block size and type I error rates. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 74–95.
6. Kao, H. S. R., & Smith, K. U. (1978). Unimanual and bimanual control in a compensatory tracking task. Ergonomics, 21, 661–669.
7. Keele, S. W. & Posner, M. I. (1968). Processing of visual information in rapid movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77,155–158.
8. Lee, T. D. (1988). Transfer-appropriate processing: A framework for conceptualizing practice effects in motor learning. In O. G. Meijer & K. Roth (Eds.), Complex movement behavior: The motor-action controversy (pp. 201–215). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
9. Lee, T. D., & Genovese, E. D. (1988). Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: Learning and performance effects reconsidered. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 277–287.
10. Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9, 241–289.
11. Miall, R. C. (in press). Task dependent changes in visual feedback control: A frequency analysis of human manual tracking. Journal of Motor Behavior.
12. Miall, R. C., Weir, D. J., & Stein, J. F. (1986). Manual tracking of visual targets by trained monkeys. Behavioral Brain Research, 20, 185–210.
13. Morikiyo, Y., & Matsushima, T. (1990). Effects of delayed visual feedback on motor control performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70,111–114.
14. Newell, K. M. (1974). Knowledge of results and motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 6, 235–244.
15. Portier, S. J., & van Galen, G. P. (1992). Immediate vs. postponed visual feedback in practicing a handwriting task. Human Movement Science, 11, 563–592.
16. Salmoni, A W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355–386.
17. Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience (pp. 59–75). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
18. Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Shapiro, D. C., & Swinnen, S. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 352–359.
19. Smith, K. U. (1962). Delayed sensory feedback and behavior. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Smith, K. U. (1966). Cybernetic theory and analysis of behavior. In E. A. Bilodeau (Ed.), Acquisition of skill (pp. 425–482). New York: Academic Press.
20. Smith, K. U., & Smith, W. M. (1962). Perception and motion: An analysis of space-structured behavior. Philadelphia: Saunders.
21. Swinnen, S. P., Schmidt, R. A., Nicholson, D. E., & Shapiro, D. C. (1990). Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 706–716.
22. Yates, A. J. (1963). Delayed auditory feedback. Psychological Bulletin, 60, 213–232.