The modern methods of diagnosis of multiple sclerosis

Zhurnal Nevropatolgii i Psikhiatrii im. S S Korsakova

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 40-43

  Bisaga, G N ^a   Golovkin, V I ^a   Lytaev, S A ^a   Mikhailenko, A A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERIMETRY; VIBRATION;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PERIMETRY; VIBRATION;

EID: 0030331955     PISSN: 00444588     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Baum K., Scheuler W., Hegerl U. et al. Acta neurol scand 1988; 77: 4: 283-288.
2. Chiappa K.H. Evoked potentials in clinical medicine. New York 1983; 352.
3. Friedman D. Psychophysiology 1990; 27: 2: 136-148.
4. Green J.B., Price R., Woodbury S.G. Arch Neurol 1980; 37: 10: 630-633.
5. Huk W.I., Gademann G., Fridemann G. Magnetic resonance imaging of central nervous system diseases: Functional anatomy imaging neurological symptoms-pathology. Berlin 1990; 450.
6. Kurtzke J.F. Neurology 1961; 11: 7: 686-694.
7. Paty D.W., Oger J.J.F., Kastrikoff L.F. Ibid 1988; 38: 2: 180-184.
8. Poser C.M., Paty D., Scheinberg L. et al. Ann Neurol 1983; 13: 2: 227-231.
9. Truyen L., Gheuens J., Van de Vyver F.L. et al. J Neurol Sciences 1990; 96; 2: 173-182.