|
Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 36-48
|
Practical public health in a primary care setting. Discrete projects confer discrete benefits but a long-term relationship is needed.
a a a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
FEASIBILITY STUDY;
GENERAL PRACTICE;
GENERAL PRACTITIONER;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH;
NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
PATIENT CARE;
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;
PUBLIC HEALTH;
PUBLIC RELATIONS;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
UNITED KINGDOM;
FAMILY PRACTICE;
FEASIBILITY STUDIES;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH;
INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS;
PATIENT CARE TEAM;
PHYSICIANS, FAMILY;
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;
PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
PROGRAM EVALUATION;
PUBLIC HEALTH;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
STATE MEDICINE;
|
EID: 0030330726
PISSN: 02689235
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1108/02689239610127798 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (0)
|