Academic outcomes and school effectiveness: Type "A" and type "B" effects

New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 143-170

  Harker, Richard ^a   Nash, Roy ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030327169     PISSN: 00288276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. 149 (1), 1-43.
2. Bryk, A.S., and Raudenbush, S.W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101 (1), 147-158.
3. Bryk, A.S., and Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, Cal.: Sage Publications Inc.
4. Bryk, A.S., Raudenbush, S.W., and Congdon, R.T. (1994). HLM/2L/3L computer programmes and user's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
5. Cheng, W.L. (1994). Do schools matter? - A critique of "Social Inequalities and Differences in School Outcomes". New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 29 (2), 201-207.
6. Coleman, J.S., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F., and York, R. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington: United States Government Printing Office.
7. Goldstein, H.I. (1986). Multilevel mixed linear model analysis using iterative generalized least squares. Biometrika, 73(1), 43-56.
8. Goldstein, H.I. (1987). Multilevel models in educational and social research. London: Oxford University Press.
9. Harker, R.K. (1995a). Analysis of school effects on School Certificate results through the use of hierarchical linear models. Paper to Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, April 18-22.
10. Harker, R.K. (1995b). Further comment on "Do Schools Matter?". New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 30 (1), 73-76.
11. Harker, R., and Nash, R. (1994). Supplementary report to 1994 Phase 1 Report: Preliminary analysis of school effects through the use of hierarchical linear models. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
12. Harker, R., and Nash, R. (1995). Analysis of school effects on School Certificate results through the use of hierarchical linear models. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
13. Kerlinger, F.N., and Pedhazur, E.J. (1973). Multiple regression in behavioural research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
14. Kreft, I.G., de Leeuw, J., and Kim, K. (1990). Comparing four different statistical packages for hierarchical linear regression: Genmod, HLM, ML2, and VARCL. Statistics Series No. 50. Los Angeles: University of California.
15. Lange, D. (1995). Schools for scandal. Listener, October 14, 36-38.
16. Lee, V.E., and Bryk, A.S. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62(3), 172-192.
17. Lee, V.E., Bryk, A.S., and Smith, J.B. (1993). The organization of effective secondary schools. In L. Darling-Hamilton (Ed.), Review of research in education, 19. Washington: American Educational Research Association.
18. McPherson, A. (1992). Measuring added value in schools. U.K.:National Commission on Education.
19. Nash, R. and Harker, R. (1994). Progress at school: Final report, phase 1. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
20. Nash, R., and Major, S. (1995). "We need to know it...": Concepts of knowledge and education. Palmerston North: ERDC Press, Massey University.
21. Paterson, L. (1991). An introduction to multilevel modelling. In S.W. Raudenbush and J.D. Willms (Eds.), Schools, classrooms and pupils. San Diego: Academic Press.
22. Powell, A., Farrar, E., and Cohen, D. (1985). The shopping mall high school: Winners and losers in the educational marketplace. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
23. Raudenbush, S.W., and Willms, J.D. (Eds.) (1991). Schools, classrooms, and pupils: International studies of schooling from a multilevel perspective. San Diego: Academic Press.
24. Raudenbush, S.W., and Willms, J.D. (in press). The estimation of school effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics.
25. Rutter, M. (1983). School effects on pupil progress: Research findings and policy implications. Child Development, 54 (1), 1-29.
26. Smith, D.J., and Tomlinson, S. (1989). The school effect: A study of multi-racial comprehensives. London: Policy Studies Institute.
27. Thomas, S., and Mortimore, P. (1994). Report on value added analysis of 1993 GCSE examination results in Lancashire. London: Curriculum Studies Department, University of London Institute of Education.
28. Thrupp, M. (1995). The school mix effect: The history of an enduring problem in educational research, policy and practice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 16 (2), 183-203.
29. Willms, J.D. (1986). Social class segregation and its relationship to pupils' examination results in Scotland. American Sociological Review, 51, 224-241.
30. Willms, J.D. (1992). Monitoring school performance. London: The Falmer Press.
31. Willms, J.D., and Kerckhoff, A.C. (1995). The challenge of developing new educational indicators. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17 (1), 113-131.
32. Willms, J.D., and Raudenbusch, S.W. (1989). A longitudinal hierarchical linear model for estimating school effects and their stability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26 (3), 209-232.