Research and Practice:: A Reflexive and Recursive Relationship- Three Narratives, Five Voices

Marriage and Family Review

Volumn 24, Issue 3-4, 1997, Pages 275-295

  Gale, Jerry ^a   Chenail, Ronald ^b   Watson, Wendy L ^c   Wright, Lorraine M ^d   Bell, Janice M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Hermeneutics; Phenomenology; Practice and research; Qualitative research; Recursive frame analysis; Self reports

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030326984     PISSN: 01494929     EISSN: 15409635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J002v24n03_03     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon.
2. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
3. Benner, P. (1994). Interpretive phenomenology: Embodiment, caring and ethics in health and illness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Chenail, R. (1991). Medical discourse and systemic frames of comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Chenail, R. J., Douthit, P., Gale, J., Stormberg, J., Morris, G. H., Park, J., Sridaromont, S., Schmer, V. (1990). It’s probably nothing serious, but Parents. interpretation of referral to pediatric cardiologists. Health Communication, 2, 3, 165-188.
6. Chenail, R. J., & Fortugno, L. (in press). Resourceful figures in therapeutic conversations. In G. H. Morris & R. J. Chenail (Eds.), The talk of the clinic: Explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Chenail, R. J., Itkin, P., Bonneau, M., & Andriacchi, C. (1993, October). Managing solutions in divorce mediation: A discourse analysis. Paper presented at the Twenty-first Annual Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution International Conference, Toronto, Canada.
8. Chenail, R. J., Zellick, S. Z., & Bonneau, M. (1992, October). How to do mediation with words: 1. Involvement strategies. Paper presented at the Twentieth Annual Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution International Conference, Pittsburgh.
9. Gale, J. E. (1991a). Conversation analysis of therapeutic discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Gale, J. (1991b). The use of self in qualitative research. Qualitative Family Research Newsletter, 5(1), 6-7.
11. Gale, J., & Newfield, N. (1992). A conversation analysis of a solution-focused marital therapy session. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 18, 2, 153-165.
12. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. O’Hanlon, W. H., & Weiner-Davis, M. (1989). In search of solutions: A new direction in psychotherapy. New York: Norton.
14. May, K. A. (1991). Interview techniques: Concerns and challenges. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research (rev.ed.) (pp. 188-201). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. May, K. A. (1994). Abstract knowing: The case for magic in method. In J. M. Morse (Ed), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 10-21). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Morse, J. M. (Ed.). (1992). Qualitative health research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Munhall, P. (1988). Ethical considerations in qualitative research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 10, 2, 150-162.
18. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behavior. London: Sage.
19. Putnam, L. L., & Holmer, M. (1992). Framing, reframing, and issue development. In L. L. Putnam &M. E. Roloff (Eds.), Communication and negotiation (pp. 128-155). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Rambo, A. H., Heath, A. W., & Chenail, R. J. (1993). Practicing therapy: Exercises for growing therapists. New York: Norton.
21. Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 3, 27-37.
22. Sandelowski, M. (1994). The proof is in the pottery: Toward a poetic for qualitative inquiry. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Schegloff, E. A., Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7, 289-327.
24. Stern, P. N. (1991). Are counting and coding a cappella appropriate in qualitative research? In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research (pp. 147-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. Tannen, D., & Wallat, C. (1993). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 57-76). New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Tripp-Reimer, T. (1985a). Reliability issues in cross-cultural research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 7, 3, 391-392.
27. Tripp-Reimer, T. (1985b). The Health Heritage project. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 8, 207-224.
28. Watson, W. L., Bell, J. M., & Wright, L. M. (1992). Osteophytes and marital fights: A single case clinical research report of chronic pain. Family Systems Medicine, 10(4), 423-435.
29. Wright, L.M., & Bell, J. M. (1989). A survey of family nursing education in Canadian Universities. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 21, 59-74.
30. Wright, L. M., Bell, J. M., & Rock, B. L. (1989). Smoking behavior and spouses: A case report. Family Systems Medicine, 7(2), 158-171.