Natural pupation sites of three North American swallowtail butterflies: Eurytides marcellus (Cramer), Papilio cresphontes cramer, and P. troilus L. (Papilionidae)

Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 297-302

  West, David A ^a   Hazel, Wade N ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DEPAUW UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmentally cued dimorphism; Pupal color

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTALLY CUED DIMORPHISM;

EID: 0030319222     PISSN: 00240966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. CLARKE, C. A. & P. M. SHEPFARD. 1972. Genetic and environmental factors influencing pupal colour in the swallowtail butterflies Battus philenor and Papilio polytes. J. Entomol. A 46:123-133.
2. COLLINS, N. M. & M. G. MORRIS. 1985. Threatened swallowtail butterflies of the world. The IUCN Red Data Book. Gland and Cambridge, IUCN. vii + 401 pp.
3. HAZEL, W. N. & D. A. WEST. 1979. Environmental control of pupal colour in swallowtail butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilioninae): Battus philenor (L.) and Papilio polyxenes Fabr. Ecol. Entomol. 4:393-400.
4. _. 1982. Pupal colour dimorphism in swallowtail butterflies as a threshold trait: selection in Eurytides marcellus (Cramer). Heredity 49:295-301.
5. _. 1996. Pupation site preference and environmentally cued pupal colour dimorphism in the swallowtail butterfly Papilio polyxenes Fabr. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 57:81-87.
6. IGARASHI, S. 1979. Papilionidae and their early stages. Vol. 2. Kodansha. Tokyo (in Japanese).
7. MOSS, A. M. 1919. The Papilios of Para. Novit. Zool. 26:295-319.
8. SIMS, S. R. & A. M. SHAPIRO. 1983. Pupal colour dimorphism in California Battus philenor: pupation sites, environmental control, and diapause linkage. Ecol. Entomol. 8:95-104.
9. _. 1984. Pupal color dimorphism in California Battus philenor (L.) (Papilionidae): mortality factors and selective advantage. J. Lepid. Soc. 37:236-243.
10. SMITH, A. G. 1978. Environmental factors influencing pupal colour determination in Lepidoptera I. Experiments with Papilio polytes, Papilio demoleus and Papilio polyxenes. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 200:295-329.
11. TYLER, H. A., K. S. BROWN & K. H. WILSON. 1994. Swallowtail butterflies of the Americas. Gainesville, Scientific Publishers. 376 pp.
12. WEST, D. A. 1995. Chapter 10. Comparative pupation behavior in the Papilio glaucus group: studies of Papilio glaucus, Papilio eurymedon and their hybrids (Lepidoptera: Papilioninae), pp. 93-99. In Scriber, J. M., Y. Tsubaki & R. C. Lederhouse (eds.), Swallowtail butterflies: their ecology and evolutionary biology. Gainesville, Scientific Publishers.
13. WEST, D. A. & W. N. HAZEL. 1979. Natural pupation sites of swallowtail butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilioninae): Papilio polyxenes Fabr., P. glaucus L. and Battus philenor (L.). Ecol. Entomol. 4:387-392.
14. _. 1982. An experimental test of natural selection for pupation site in swallowtail butterflies. Evolution 36:152-159.
15. _. 1985. Pupal colour dimorphism in swallowtail butterflies: timing of the sensitive period and environmental control. Physiol. Entomol. 10:113-119.
16. WIKLUND, C. 1975. Pupal colour polymorphism in Papilio machaon L. and the survival in the field of cryptic versus non-cryptic pupae. Trans. Roy. Entomol. Soc. London 127:73-84.