Negotiating development: Planning gain and mitigating impacts

Journal of Property Research

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 143-160

  Healey, Patsy ^a   Purdue, Michael ^a   Ennis, Frank ^b  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Developers' contributions; Development impacts; Planning agreements

Indexed keywords

NATIONAL PLANNING; PLANNING REGULATION;

EID: 0030319011     PISSN: 09599916     EISSN: 14664453     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09599916.1996.9965062     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alterman, R. (ed) (1988) Private Supply of Public Services: Evaluation of Real Estate Exactions, Linkages and Alternative Land Policies. New York University Press, New York.
2. Bailey, S. (1990) Charges for local infrastructure, Town Planning Review, 61 (4), 427-53.
3. Ball, M. (1983) Housing Policy and Economic Power. MacMillan, London.
4. Berkshire County Council (1989) Infrastructure, Services and Amenity Requirements for New Developments in Berkshire Berkshire CC, Reading.
5. Brindley, T., Rydin, R. and Stoker, G. (1989) Remaking Planning. Unwin Hyman, London.
6. Cadman, D. and Austin-Crowe, L. (1991) Property Development, Third Edition. E & FN Spon, London.
7. Callies, D. and Grant, M. (1991) Planning for growth and planning gain: an Anglo-American comparison of development conditions, impact fees and development agreements, The Urban Lawyer, 23 (2), 221-48.
8. Cowell, R. (1993) 'Take and give': managing the impacts of development with environmental compensation. UKCEED Discussion Paper No 10, UKCEED, Cambridge.
9. Cullingworth, J.B., (1975) Reconstruction and Land Use Planning 1934-1947, Environmental History, volume 1. HMSO, London.
10. Curry, N. (1991) View point: selling planning permission, Town Planning Review, 62 (3), v-viii.
11. Davies, H.W.E., Edwards, D., Hooper, A. and Punter J. (1989) Planning Control in Western Europe. HMSO, London.
12. Delafons, J. (1991a) Planning in the USA: paying for development, The Planner, 77 (20), 8-9.
13. Delafons, J. (1991b) Development Impact Fees and Other Devices. University of California, Berkeley.
14. Department of the Environment (1983) Circular 22/83: Planning Gain. HMSO, London.
15. Department of the Environment (1986) The Future of Development Plans. DoE, London.
16. Department of the Environment (1991a) Circular 7/91: Planning and Affordable Housing. HMSO, London.
17. Department of the Environment (1991b) Circular 16/91: Planning Obligations. HMSO, London.
18. Department of the Environment (1992) Planning Policy Guidance 3: Housing. HMSO, London.
19. Elson, M. and Payne, D. (1993) Planning and Obligations for Sport and Recreation: a Guide for Negotiation and Action. Sports Council, London.
20. Ennis, F. (1994) Planning obligations in development plans, Land Use Policy, 11 (3), 195-207.
21. Gerald Eve, Chartered Surveyors and the Department of Land Economy, Cambridge (1992), The Relationship of House Prices and Land Supply. HMSO, London.
22. Goodchild, B. and Henneberry, J. (1994) Impact Fees for Planning. RICS, London.
23. Gore, T. and Nicholson, D. (1991) Models of the land development process: a critical review, Environmental and Planning A, 123, 705-30.
24. Grant, M. (1991) Betterment again, JPEL OCE Paper No. 18, The Planning Balance in the 1990s. Sweet and Maxwell, London.
25. Grove-White, R. (1991) Land-use law and environment, Journal of Law and Society, 18 (1), 32-47.
26. Hall, P., Gracey, H., Drewett, R. and Thomas, R. (1973) The Containment of Urban England. Allen and Unwin, London.
27. Healey, P. (1991) Models of the development process: a review, Journal of Property Research, 8 (3), 210-38.
28. Healey, P. (1992) Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory, Town Planning Review, 63 (2), 143-62.
29. Healey, P., McNamara, P., Doak, J. and Elson, M. (1988) Land Use Planning and the Mediation of Urban Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Volume 7 pp. 12-20.
30. Healey, P., Purdue, M. and Ennis, F. (1993) Gains from Planning? Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.
31. Healey, P., Purdue, M. and Ennis, F. (1995) Negotiating Development. E & FN Spon, London.
32. Labour Party (1994) In Trust for Tomorrow: Report of the Labour Party Policy Commission on the Environment. Labour Party, London.
33. Lichfield, N. (1989) From planning gain to community benefit, Journal of Planning and Environmental Law, February 68-81.
34. Lichfield, N. and Darin-Drabkin, H. (1980) Land Policy and Urban Growth. Albert Unwin, London.
35. Nicholas, J.C., Nelson, A.C. and Juergensmeyer, J.C. (1991) A Practitioners Guide to Development Impact Fees. Planners Press, Chicago.
36. Northumberland CC v Secretary of State for the Environment (1989) Journal of Planning and Environmental law 700.
37. Ravetz, A. (1980) Remaking Cities. Croom Helm, London.
38. Rodriguez-Bachiller, A., Thomas, M. and Ward, S. (1992) The English planning lottery: some insights from a more regulated system, Town Planning Review, 63, 387-401.
39. Wakeford, R. (1990) American Development Control: Parallels and Parodoxes from an English Perspective. HMSO, London.
40. Young, G. (1992) Keynote address in Development Plans Master or Servant (edited by G. Hart), Journal of Planning and Environmental Law, occasional paper No. 18, Sweet and Maxwell, London.