Non-compensatory preference structures in non-market valuation of natural area policy

Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 85-101

  Lockwood, Michael ^a  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC WELFARE; ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES; NATURAL AREA; NON-COMPENSATORY; NON-MARKET GOODS; POLICY ASSESSMENT;

EID: 0030318219     PISSN: 1364985X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8489.1996.tb00557.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Boyce, R.R., Brown, T.C., McLelland, G.H., Peterson, G.L. and Schulze, W.D. (1992), 'An experimental examination of intrinsic values as a source of the WTA-WTP disparity', American Economic Review 82, 1366-1373.
2. Earl, P.E. (1983), The Economic Imagination. Sharpe, New York.
3. Edwards, S.F. (1986), 'Ethical preferences and the assessment of existence values: does the neoclassical model fit?', Northeastern Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics 15, 145-150.
4. Encarnación, J. (1964), 'A note on lexicographical preferences', Econometrica 32, 215-217.
5. Encarnación, J. (1990), 'Consumer choice of qualities', Economica 57, 63-72.
6. Etzioni, A. (1986), 'The case for a multiple utility conception', Economics and Philosophy 2, 159-183.
7. Findlater, P.A. and Sinden, J.A. (1982), 'Estimation of recreation benefits from measured utility functions', American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64, 102-109.
8. Fischhoff, B. and Furby, L. (1988), 'Measuring values: a conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special reference to contingent valuation of visibility', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1, 147-184.
9. Fishburn, P.C. (1974), 'Lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules: a survey', Management Science 20, 1442-1471.
10. Ford, J.K., Schmidtt, N., Schechtman, S.L., Hults, B.M. and Doherty, M.L. (1989), 'Process tracing methods: contributions, problems and neglected research questions', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process 43, 75-117.
11. Freeman, A.M. (1993), 'Nonuse values in natural resource damage assessment', in Kopp, R.J., and V.K. Smith (eds), Valuing natural assets: the economics of natural resource damage assessment. Resources for the Future, Washington.
12. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1954), 'Choice, expectations and measurability', Quarterly Journal of Economics 68, 503-534.
13. Gravelle, H. and Rees, R. (1981), Microeconomics, Longman, London.
14. Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P. (1993), 'Valuing environmental resources: a constructive approach', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7, 177-197.
15. Hanemann, W.M. (1991), 'Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ?', American Economic Review 81, 635-647.
16. Hershey, J.C., Kunreuther, H.C. and Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1982), 'Sources of bias in assessment procedures for utility functions', Management Science 28, 936-954.
17. Irwin, J.R., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S. and McClelland, G.H. (1993), 'Preference reversals and the measurement of environmental values', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 6, 5-18.
18. Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H. (1976), Decision with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.
19. Lazo, J.K., Schulze, W.D., McClelland, G.H. and Doyle, J.K. (1992), 'Can contingent valuation measure nonuse values?', American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74, 1126-1132.
20. MacCrimmon, K.R. and Toda, M. (1969), 'The experimental determination of indifference curves', Review of Economic Studies 36, 433-451.
21. MacCrimmon, K.R. and Wehrung, D.A. (1977), 'Trade-off analysis: the indifference and prefed proportions approaches', in Bell, D.E., R.L. Keeney and H. Raiffa (eds), Conflicting objectives in decisions, Wiley, Chichester.
22. Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. (1989), Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method, Resources for the Future, Washington.
23. Moldau, J.H. (1993), 'A model of choice where choice is determined by an ordered set of irreducible criteria', Journal of Economic Theory 60, 354-377.
24. Peterson, G.L., Brown, T.C., McCollum, D.W., Bell, P.A., Birjulin, A.A., and Clarke, A. (1994), Moral responsibility effects in valuation of WTA for public and private goods by the method of paired comparison, Paper presented to Forestry and the Environment: Economic Perspectives II Conference, Banff, Canada.
25. Sinden, J.A. (1974), 'A utility approach to the valuation of recreational and aesthetic experiences', American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56, 61-72.
26. Sinden, J.A. and Wyckoff, J.B. (1976), 'Indifference mapping: an empirical methodology for economic evaluation of the environment', Regional Science and Urban Economics 6, 81-103.
27. Spash, C.L. and Hanley, N. (1995), 'Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation,' Ecological Economics 12, 191-208.
28. Stevens, T.H., Echevia, J., Glass, R.J., Hager, T. and More, T.A. (1991), 'Measuring the existence value of wildlife: what do CVM estimates really show?', Land Economics 67, 390-400.
29. Zakay, D. and Tsal, Y (1993), 'The impact of using forced decision-making strategies on post-decisional confidence', Journal of Behavioural Decision Making 6, 53-68.