The debate concerning the demand for NIE exports and the small country assumption: A critical review

Singapore Economic Review

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 1-12

  Nguyen, Tin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXPORT DEMAND; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; NEWLY INDUSTRIALISING ECONOMY; SMALL COUNTRY;

CHINA, HONG KONG;

EID: 0030316563     PISSN: 02175908     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Athukorala, P. and Riedel, J. (1994) Demand and supply factors in the determination of NIE exports: a comment. Economic Journal, 104, pp. 1411-1414.
2. Cline, W. (1982) Can the East Asian model of development be generalised. World Development, 10, pp. 82-90.
3. Gujarati, D. N. (1995) Basic Econometrics, second edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4. Johnston, J. (1984) Econometric Methods, third edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Krugman, P. (1989) Income elasticities and real exchange rate. European Economic Review, 33, pp. 1031-54.
6. Maddala, G. S. (1992) Introduction to Econometrics, second edition. New York: MacMillan.
7. Muscatelli, V. A., Srinivasan, T. G. and Vines, D. (1992) Demand and supply factors in the determination of NIE exports: a simultaneous error-correction model for Hong Kong. Economic Journal, 102, pp. 1467-77.
8. Muscatelli, V. A., Srinivasan, T. G and Vines, D. (1994) The empirical modelling of NIE exports: an evaluation of different approaches. Journal of Development Studies, 30, pp. 279-302.
9. Muscatelli, V. A. (1994) Demand and supply factors in the determination of NIE exports: a reply. Economic Journal, 104, pp. 1415-17.
10. Nguyen, D. T. (1989) The demand for LDC exports of manufactures: estimates from Hong Kong: a comment. Economic Journal, 99, pp. 461-6.
11. Riedel, J. (1988) The demand for LDC exports of manufactures: estimates from Hong Kong. Economic Journal, 98, pp. 138-49.
12. Riedel, J. (1989) The demand for LDC exports of manufactures: estimate from Hong Kong: a rejoinder. Economic Journal, 99, pp. 466-70.