Resistance to equality

University of Pittsburgh Law Review

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 477-523

  Schneider, Elizabeth M ^a  

^a BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030310754     PISSN: 00419915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Elizabeth M. Schneider, Feminism and the False Dichotomy of Victimization and Agency, 38 N.Y.U. L. REV. 387 (1993); Elizabeth M. Schneider, The Violence of Privacy, 23 CONN. L. REV. 973 (1991); Schneider, Describing and Changing, supra note 2; Schneider, Equal Rights, supra note 2; Schneider & Jordan, Representation of Women, supra note 2.
2. Elizabeth M. Schneider, Feminism and the False Dichotomy of Victimization and Agency, 38 N.Y.U. L. REV. 387 (1993); Elizabeth M. Schneider, The Violence of Privacy, 23 CONN. L. REV. 973 (1991); Schneider, Describing and Changing, supra note 2; Schneider, Equal Rights, supra note 2; Schneider & Jordan, Representation of Women, supra note 2.
3. Elizabeth M. Schneider, Feminism and the False Dichotomy of Victimization and Agency, 38 N.Y.U. L. REV. 387 (1993); Elizabeth M. Schneider, The Violence of Privacy, 23 CONN. L. REV. 973 (1991); Schneider, Describing and Changing, supra note 2; Schneider, Equal Rights, supra note 2; Schneider & Jordan, Representation of Women, supra note 2.
4. Elizabeth M. Schneider, Feminism and the False Dichotomy of Victimization and Agency, 38 N.Y.U. L. REV. 387 (1993); Elizabeth M. Schneider, The Violence of Privacy, 23 CONN. L. REV. 973 (1991); Schneider, Describing and Changing, supra note 2; Schneider, Equal Rights, supra note 2; Schneider & Jordan, Representation of Women, supra note 2.
5. Elizabeth M. Schneider, Feminism and the False Dichotomy of Victimization and Agency, 38 N.Y.U. L. REV. 387 (1993); Elizabeth M. Schneider, The Violence of Privacy, 23 CONN. L. REV. 973 (1991); Schneider, Describing and Changing, supra note 2; Schneider, Equal Rights, supra note 2; Schneider & Jordan, Representation of Women, supra note 2.
6. See Elizabeth M. Schneider, The Dialectic of Rights and Politics: Perspectives from the Women's Movement, 61 N.Y.U. L. REV. 589 (1986); Schneider, Describing and Changing, supra note 2.
7. See Elizabeth M. Schneider, The Dialectic of Rights and Politics: Perspectives from the Women's Movement, 61 N.Y.U. L. REV. 589 (1986); Schneider, Describing and Changing, supra note 2.
8. See, e.g., George P. Fletcher, Domination in the Theory of Justification and Excuse, 57 U. PITT. L. REV. 553 (1996); Arthur Ripstein, Self-Defense and Equal Protection, 57 U. PITT. L. REV. 685 (1996).
9. See, e.g., George P. Fletcher, Domination in the Theory of Justification and Excuse, 57 U. PITT. L. REV. 553 (1996); Arthur Ripstein, Self-Defense and Equal Protection, 57 U. PITT. L. REV. 685 (1996).
10. See Schneider, Equal Rights, supra note 2; Schneider & Jordan, Representation of Women, supra note 2. For a more recent analysis raising related issues concerning denial of battered women's rights to present a defense with respect to expert testimony on "battered woman syndrome," see Erich D. Anderson & Anne Read-Anderson, Constitutional Dimensions of the Battered Woman Syndrome, 53 OHIO ST. L.J. 363 (1992).
11. See Schneider, Equal Rights, supra note 2; Schneider & Jordan, Representation of Women, supra note 2. For a more recent analysis raising related issues concerning denial of battered women's rights to present a defense with respect to expert testimony on "battered woman syndrome," see Erich D. Anderson & Anne Read-Anderson, Constitutional Dimensions of the Battered Woman Syndrome, 53 OHIO ST. L.J. 363 (1992).
12. See Schneider, Equal Rights, supra note 2; Schneider & Jordan, Representation of Women, supra note 2. For a more recent analysis raising related issues concerning denial of battered women's rights to present a defense with respect to expert testimony on "battered woman syndrome," see Erich D. Anderson & Anne Read-Anderson, Constitutional Dimensions of the Battered Woman Syndrome, 53 OHIO ST. L.J. 363 (1992).
13. Stephen J. Schulhofer, The Feminist Challenge in Criminal Law, 143 U. PA. L. REV. 2151, 2153 (1995).
14. Jane Maslow Cohen, Regimes of Private Tyranny, 57 U. PITT. L. REV. 757 (1996) (placing intimate violence within framework of political tyranny).
15. State v. Stewart, 763 P.2d 572, 584 (Kan. 1988) (Herd, J., dissenting) (arguing that the majority should have accepted a battered woman's claim of self-defense, comparing her situation to that of a hostage, in which case the court would accept the same argument); Anthony J. Sebok, Does an Objective Theory of Self-Defense Demand Too Much?, 57 U. PITT. L. REV. 725, 752 (1996).
16. State v. Stewart, 763 P.2d 572, 584 (Kan. 1988) (Herd, J., dissenting) (arguing that the majority should have accepted a battered woman's claim of self-defense, comparing her situation to that of a hostage, in which case the court would accept the same argument); Anthony J. Sebok, Does an Objective Theory of Self-Defense Demand Too Much?, 57 U. PITT. L. REV. 725, 752 (1996).
17. See Susan N. Herman, Thelma and Louise and Bonnie and Jean: Images of Women as Criminals, 2 S. CAL. REV. L. & WOMEN'S STUD. 53 (1992); Elizabeth V. Spelman & Martha Minow, Outlaw Women: An Essay on Thelma and Louise, 26 New Eng. L. Rev. 1281 (1992) see also supra note 21 and accompanying text.
18. See Susan N. Herman, Thelma and Louise and Bonnie and Jean: Images of Women as Criminals, 2 S. CAL. REV. L. & WOMEN'S STUD. 53 (1992); Elizabeth V. Spelman & Martha Minow, Outlaw Women: An Essay on Thelma and Louise, 26 New Eng. L. Rev. 1281 (1992) see also supra note 21 and accompanying text.
19. Schneider, Particularity and Generality, supra note 2, at 531.
20. See, e.g., EDWARD GONDOLF & ELLEN FISHER, BATTERED WOMEN AS SURVIVORS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO TREATING LEARNED HELPLESSNESS 11 (1988) (arguing that women, rather than "giving up," "respond to abuse with helpseeking efforts that are largely unmet."); Dutton, supra note 2 at 1227-30; Stark, supra note 37 at 1000.
21. See, e.g., EDWARD GONDOLF & ELLEN FISHER, BATTERED WOMEN AS SURVIVORS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO TREATING LEARNED HELPLESSNESS 11 (1988) (arguing that women, rather than "giving up," "respond to abuse with helpseeking efforts that are largely unmet."); Dutton, supra note 2 at 1227-30; Stark, supra note 37 at 1000.
22. See, e.g., EDWARD GONDOLF & ELLEN FISHER, BATTERED WOMEN AS SURVIVORS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO TREATING LEARNED HELPLESSNESS 11 (1988) (arguing that women, rather than "giving up," "respond to abuse with helpseeking efforts that are largely unmet."); Dutton, supra note 2 at 1227-30; Stark, supra note 37 at 1000.
23. See. e.g., Banks v. State, 608 A.2d 1249 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1992) (restricting the definition of "battered spouse" for evidentiary purposes); State v. Donner, 645 N.E.2d 165 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994) (restricting the definition of "battered woman" for evidentiary purposes).
24. See. e.g., Banks v. State, 608 A.2d 1249 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1992) (restricting the definition of "battered spouse" for evidentiary purposes); State v. Donner, 645 N.E.2d 165 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994) (restricting the definition of "battered woman" for evidentiary purposes).
25. See State v. Scott, 1989 WL 90613 (Del. Super. 1989); Larson v. State, 766 P.2d 261 (Nev. 1988); State v. Zimmerman, 823 S.W.2d 220 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991); State v. Gfeller, 1987 WL 14328 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987).
26. See State v. Scott, 1989 WL 90613 (Del. Super. 1989); Larson v. State, 766 P.2d 261 (Nev. 1988); State v. Zimmerman, 823 S.W.2d 220 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991); State v. Gfeller, 1987 WL 14328 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987).
27. See State v. Scott, 1989 WL 90613 (Del. Super. 1989); Larson v. State, 766 P.2d 261 (Nev. 1988); State v. Zimmerman, 823 S.W.2d 220 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991); State v. Gfeller, 1987 WL 14328 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987).
28. See State v. Scott, 1989 WL 90613 (Del. Super. 1989); Larson v. State, 766 P.2d 261 (Nev. 1988); State v. Zimmerman, 823 S.W.2d 220 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991); State v. Gfeller, 1987 WL 14328 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987).
29. See Ammons, Discretionary Justice, supra note 2; Leslie F. Goldstein, Contemporary Cases in Women's Rights 276 (1994).
30. See Ammons, Discretionary Justice, supra note 2; Leslie F. Goldstein, Contemporary Cases in Women's Rights 276 (1994).
31. Jody Armour, Just Deserts: Narrative, Perspective, Choice, and Blame, 57 U. Pirr. L. REV. 525 (1996).
32. Iris Marion Young, The Generality of Law and the Specifics of Cases: A Comment on Elizabeth Schneider, 57 U. PITT. L. REV. 549 (1996).
33. See Jane C. Murphy, Lawyering for Social Change: The Power of the Narrative in Domestic Violence Law Reform, 21 HOFSTRA L. REV. 1243 (1993); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990).
34. See Jane C. Murphy, Lawyering for Social Change: The Power of the Narrative in Domestic Violence Law Reform, 21 HOFSTRA L. REV. 1243 (1993); Lucie E. White, Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G., 38 BUFF. L. REV. 1 (1990).