Teleradiology or teleconsultation for emergency nurse practitioners?

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 2, Issue SUPPL. 1, 1996, Pages 56-58

  Tachakra, S ^a   Freij, R ^a   Mullett, S ^a   Sivakumar, A ^a  

^a CENTRAL MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DISLOCATION; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EMERGENCY NURSING; FRACTURE; HUMAN; NURSE PRACTITIONER; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY; TELECONSULTATION; TELERADIOLOGY;

CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DISLOCATIONS; EMERGENCY NURSING; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FRACTURES, BONE; HUMANS; NURSE PRACTITIONERS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REMOTE CONSULTATION; TELERADIOLOGY;

EID: 0030309283     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/1357633961929286     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Berman L, de Lacey G, Twomey E, et al. Reducing errors in the accident department: a simple method using radiographers. Radiography 1986;52:143-4
2. Berbaum KS, Franken EA, El- Khoury GY. Impact of clinical history on radiographic detection of fractures: a comparison of radiologists and orthopaedics. American Journal of Radiology 1989;153:1221-4
3. Slasky SB, Gur D, Good WF, et al. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest images with conventional laser printed and high resolution workstation images. Radiology 1990;174:775-80
4. Ackerman SJ, Gitlin JN, Gayler RW, et al. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of fracture and pneumonia detection: comparison of laser digitized workstation images and conventional analogue radiographs. Radiology 1993;186:263-8
5. Rajavi M, Sayne JW, Taira EK, et al. Receiver operating characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard copy vs 2K × 2K soft copy images. American Journal of Radiology 1992;158:443-8
6. Thaete LF, Furman CR, Oliver JH, et al. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performances. American Journal of Radiology 1994;162:575-81
7. Cox GG, Cook LT, McMillan JE, et al. Chest radiography: comparison of high resolution digital display and conventional and digital film. Radiology 1990;176:771-6
8. Gary LS, O'Connor BD, Back DB, et al. Digital teleradiology: Seaforth London network. Journal of the Canadian Association of Radiologists 1989;40:71-4
9. Goldberg MA, Rosenthal DI, Chew FS, et al. New high-resolution teleradiology system: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy in 685 transmitted clinical cases. Radiology 1993;186:429-34
10. Scott WS, Rosenbourne JE, Ackerman SJ, et al. Subtle orthopaedic fractures: teleradiology workstation versus film interpretation. Radiology 1993;187:811-15
11. Scott WS, Wellen GR, Gitlin JN, et al. Interpretation of emergency department radiographs by radiologists and emergency medicine physicians: teleradiology workstations vs radiographic readings. Radiology 1995;195:223-9
12. Arnsteen NB, Cheu DCP, Siegel ME. Interpretation of bone scans using a video display: a necessary step towards a filmless nuclear medicine department. Clinical Nuclear Medicine 1990;15:418-23
13. Page G, Gregoire A, Galand C, et al. Teleradiology in Northern Quebec. Radiology 1991;140:361-6