|
|
Volumn 34, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 374-415
|
|
Patient autonomy and the defence of medical necessity: five Dutch euthanasia cases.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
DRUG;
ACTIVE EUTHANASIA;
ALTRUISM;
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
BENEFICENCE;
CASE REPORT;
CHRONIC DISEASE;
CRIMINAL LAW;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DEPRESSION;
DISABLED PERSON;
DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION;
EUTHANASIA;
FREEDOM;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
HOMICIDE;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL LIABILITY;
MENTAL PATIENT;
MENTAL STRESS;
MOTIVATION;
NETHERLANDS;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIAN;
POLICY;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
ROYAL DUTCH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
ROYAL DUTCH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION;
ALTRUISM;
BENEFICENCE;
CHRONIC DISEASE;
CRIMINAL LAW;
DEPRESSIVE DISORDER;
DISABLED PERSONS;
EUTHANASIA;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE, VOLUNTARY;
FREEDOM;
GUIDELINES;
HOMICIDE;
HUMANS;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LIABILITY, LEGAL;
MENTALLY ILL PERSONS;
MOTIVATION;
NETHERLANDS;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS;
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;
PHYSICIANS;
PUBLIC POLICY;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
SOCIETIES;
STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
|
EID: 0030308466
PISSN: 00024821
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.29173/alr1086 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (10)
|
|
References (0)
|
