|
Volumn 15, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 471-504
|
Taking Tarasoff where no one has gone before: looking at "duty to warn" under the AIDS crisis.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME;
ARTICLE;
BLOOD TRANSFUSION;
COMMUNICABLE DISEASE;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
CONTACT EXAMINATION;
DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HOSPITAL;
HUMAN;
HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL LIABILITY;
MANDATORY REPORTING;
PHYSICIAN;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
REISNER V. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;
SOCIAL CONTROL;
TARASOFF V. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;
UNITED STATES;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
REISNER V. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;
TARASOFF V. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;
ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME;
BLOOD TRANSFUSION;
CALIFORNIA;
COMMUNICABLE DISEASES;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
CONTACT TRACING;
DISCLOSURE;
DUTY TO WARN;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HIV SEROPOSITIVITY;
HOSPITALS;
HUMANS;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LIABILITY, LEGAL;
MANDATORY REPORTING;
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;
PHYSICIANS;
SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0030308422
PISSN: 08988404
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (8)
|
References (0)
|