|
|
|
Volumn 53, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 803-848
|
|
Medical futility: a futile concept?
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ANENCEPHALUS;
ARTICLE;
BRAIN DEATH;
CONFLICT;
CONSENSUS;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION;
FAMILY;
FREEDOM;
GROUP PROCESS;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
HOSPITAL;
HUMAN;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
IN RE BABY K;
IN RE WANGLIE;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LONG TERM CARE;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PATIENT ABANDONMENT;
PATIENT TRANSPORT;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIAN;
PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;
POLITICS;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
RESUSCITATION;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
IN RE BABY K;
IN RE WANGLIE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
ANENCEPHALY;
BRAIN DEATH;
CONSENSUS;
DECISION MAKING;
DISSENT AND DISPUTES;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FAMILY;
FREEDOM;
GROUP PROCESSES;
HEALTH CARE RATIONING;
HOSPITALS;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
HUMANS;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LIFE SUPPORT CARE;
MEDICAL FUTILITY;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
PATIENT TRANSFER;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIAN'S ROLE;
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;
PHYSICIANS;
POLITICS;
REFUSAL TO TREAT;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
RESUSCITATION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNITED STATES;
VALUE OF LIFE;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
|
EID: 0030308292
PISSN: 00430463
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (5)
|
|
References (0)
|
