|
|
|
Volumn 11, Issue , 1996, Pages 19-48
|
|
The implantation of rights: an argument for unconditionally funded Norplant removal.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
LEVONORGESTREL;
ARTICLE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
CONTRACEPTION;
FAMILY PLANNING;
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT;
FREEDOM;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
MEDICAID;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
POLICY;
POVERTY;
PRIVACY;
REPRODUCTION;
UNITED STATES;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
MEDICAID;
NORPLANT;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
COERCION;
CONTRACEPTION;
FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
FINANCING, GOVERNMENT;
FREEDOM;
GOVERNMENT;
HUMANS;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEVONORGESTREL;
MEDICAID;
OKLAHOMA;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
POVERTY;
PRIVACY;
PUBLIC POLICY;
REPRODUCTION;
SOUTH CAROLINA;
SOUTH DAKOTA;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
UNITED STATES;
|
|
EID: 0030307562
PISSN: 08824312
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (5)
|
|
References (0)
|
