Negotiating institutional reform: The Uruguay Round, the GATT, and the WTO

Global Governance

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 119-148

  Stiles, Kendall ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030306862     PISSN: 10752846     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/19426720-002-01-90000008     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Robert O. Keohane, "International Institutions: Two Approaches," International Studies Quarterly 32, no. 4 (December 1988): 379-396.
2. Robert Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books, 1984); Robert O. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984); Stephen D. Krasner, "Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables," International Organization 36, no. 2 (Spring 1982): 185-205.
3. Robert Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books, 1984); Robert O. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984); Stephen D. Krasner, "Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables," International Organization 36, no. 2 (Spring 1982): 185-205.
4. Robert Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books, 1984); Robert O. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984); Stephen D. Krasner, "Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables," International Organization 36, no. 2 (Spring 1982): 185-205.
5. James R. Cannon, Jr., and Karen Bland, "GATT Panels Need Restraining Principles" Law and Policy in International Business 24, no. 4 (1993): 1167-1184.
6. Kenneth Dam, The GATT: Law and International Economic Organization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970); Robert E. Hudec, The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy, rev. ed. (New York, Praeger 1990); John H. Jackson, The World Trade System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989).
7. Kenneth Dam, The GATT: Law and International Economic Organization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970); Robert E. Hudec, The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy, rev. ed. (New York, Praeger 1990); John H. Jackson, The World Trade System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989).
8. Kenneth Dam, The GATT: Law and International Economic Organization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970); Robert E. Hudec, The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy, rev. ed. (New York, Praeger 1990); John H. Jackson, The World Trade System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989).
9. Pierre Pescatore, "The GATT Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Its Present Situation and Its Prospects," Journal of International Arbitration 10 (March 1993): 34.
10. Robert E. Hudec, The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy, rev. ed. (New York: Praeger, 1990), p. 48.
11. Meihard Hilf, "Settlement of Disputes in International Economic Organizations: Comparative Analysis and Proposals for Strengthening the GATT Disputes Settlement Procedures," in Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann and Meinhard Hilf, eds., The New GATT Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Legal and Economic Problems, 2d ed. (Boston: Kluwer Law & Taxation Publishers, 1991), p. 303.
12. Pescatore, "The GATT Dispute Settlement Mechanism," p. 32.
13. Reinhart Rode, ed., GATT and Conflict Management: A Transatlantic Strategy for a Stronger Regime (Boulder: Westview, 1990), p. 119.
14. John H. Jackson, Restructuring the GATT System (New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1990), p. 25.
15. Robert E. Hudec, "Reforming GATT Adjudication Procedures: The Lessons of the DISC Case," Minnesota Law Review 72 (1988): 1509.
16. Jagdish Bhagwati and Hugh T. Patrick, Aggressive Unilateralism: America's 301 Trade Policy and the World Trading System (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990).
17. Jeffrey Schott, "U.S. Policies Towards the GATT: Past, Present Prospective," in Rode, GATT and Conflict Management, pp. 31-32.
18. GATT, "Trade Policies for a Better Future: Proposals for Action," Geneva, March 1985, p. 45.
19. Ibid., p. 42.
20. Schott, "U.S. Policies Towards the GATT," p. 39.
21. GATT, Punta del Este Declaration, Geneva, November 1985.
22. Bhagirath L. Das, "The GATT Ministerial Meeting 1982: An Interpretive Note," Journal of World Trade Law 18 (1982): 11-12.
23. GATT, Punta del Este Declaration.
24. Kenneth W. Abbott, "GATT as a Public Institution: The Uruguay Round and Beyond," Brooklyn Journal of International Law 18, no. 1 (1992): 68.
25. Jackson, Restructuring the GATT System, p. 66.
26. Terence Stewart and Christopher J. Callahan, The GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiating History (1986-1992): Dispute Settlement Mechanisms (Boston: Kluwer Law & Taxation, 1993), pp. 77-81.
27. Eric Canal-Forgues and Rudolf Ostrihansky, "New Developments in the GATT Dispute Settlement Procedures," Journal of World Trade Law 24, no. 2 (1990): 81.
28. GATT Focus, no. 2 (1992), p. 2.
29. Colleen Hamilton and John Whalley, "The GATT System in the 1990s," Journal of Legislation 17 (1991): 170.
30. Bhagwati and Patrick, Aggressive Unilateralism.
31. 27. Robert E. Hudec, "Dispute Settlement," in Jeffrey Schott, ed., Completing the Uruguay Round: A Results-Oriented Approach to the GATT Trade Negotiations (Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 1990), p. 187.
32. The Dunkel Draft produced later added the caveat that the council could, by consensus, oppose formation of a panel. Abbott, "GATT as a Public Institution," p. 54.
33. Kenneth W. Abbott, "The Uruguay Round and Dispute Resolution: Building a Private-Interests System of Justice," Columbia Business Law Review, no. 1 (1992): 141-142, 146.
34. Robert E. Hudec, "Comments," Columbia Business Law Review (1992): 154.
35. Pescatore, "The GATT Dispute Settlement Mechanism," pp. 38-39.
36. Christopher Bail, "Remarks," American Society of International Law Proceedings 86 (1992): 73-74.
37. David Palmeter and Gregory Spak, "Resolving Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Disputes: Defining GATT'S Role in an Era of Increasing Conflict," Law & Policy in International Business 24, no. 4 (1993): 1148.
38. GATT Focus, no. 1-2 (1994), p. 6.
39. "New WTO Chief Criticizes Italy for the Weak Lira," Wall Street Journal, 4 May 1995, p. A8.