Minimality of consistent solutions for strategic games, in particular for potential games

Economic Theory

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 81-93

  Peleg, Bezalel ^a   Potters, Jos ^b   Tijs, Stef ^c  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030306222     PISSN: 09382259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01212183     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. 1. Aumann, R. J.: Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. In: Tucker, A. W., Luce, R. D. (eds.) Contributions to the theory of games IV, pp. 287-324. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press 1959
2. 2. Aumann, R. J.: Game theory. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds.) The new Palgrave, A dictionary of economics, Vol. 2, pp. 479-480. London: Macmillan 1987
3. 3. Aumann, R. J.: An axiomatization of the nontransferable utility value. Econometrica 53, 599-612 (1987)
4. 4. Greenberg, J.: The theory of social situations: An alternative game-theoretic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993
5. 5. Monderer, D., Shapley, L. S.: Potential games. Discussion paper, Department of Economics, UCLA, Los Angeles, 1993
6. 6. Norde, H., Potters, J. A. M., Reijnierse, H., Vermeulen, D.: Equilibrium selection and consistency. Games Econ. Behav. (forthcoming)
7. 7. Peleg, B.: An axiomatization of the core of cooperative games. J. Math. Econ. 14, 203-214 (1985)
8. 8. Peleg, B., Sudhölter, P.: An axiomatization of Nash equilibria in economic situations. Discussion paper, University of Bielefeld, March 1994
9. 9. Peleg, B., Tijs, S. H.: The consistency principle for games in strategic form. Discussion paper #19, Center for Rationality and Interactive Decision Theory, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1992
10. 10. Rosenthal, R. W.: A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria. Int. J. Game Theory 2, 65-67 (1973)