Foreign exchange rationing and the aggregate import demand function

Economics Letters

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 315-322

  Emran, M Shahe ^a   Shilpi, Forhad ^a,b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cointegration; Foreign exchange rationing; Import demand; Scarcity price

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030306139     PISSN: 01651765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1765(96)00824-5     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Boylan, T.A., M.P. Cuddy and I. Muricheartaigh, 1980, The functional form of aggregate import demand equation, Journal of International Economics 10, 561-566.
2. Campbell, J. and P. Perron, 1991, What macroeconomists should know about unit roots, in: O. Blanchard and S. Fisher, eds., NBER macroeconomics annual (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
3. Cheung, Y.W. and K. Lai, 1993, Finite-sample sizes of Johansen's likelihood ratio tests for cointegration, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 55, 313-328.
4. Doornik, J.A. and H. Hansen, 1994, An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality, Working Paper, Nuffield College, Oxford.
5. Goldstein, M. and M. Khan, 1985, Income and price effects in foreign trade, in: R.W. Jones and B.B. Kenen, eds., Handbook of international economics (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1041-1105.
6. Hemphill, W., 1974, The effects of foreign exchange receipts on imports of less developed countries, IMF Staff Papers 21, 637-677.
7. Hubbard, R.G. and A. Kashyap, 1992, Internal networth and the investment process: An application to US agriculture, Journal of Political Economy 100, 506-534.
8. Johansen, S., 1988, Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 231-254.
9. Johansen, S. and K. Juselius, 1990, Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration - with application to the demand for money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52, 169-210.
10. Moran, C., 1989, Imports under a foreign exchange constraint, The World Bank Economic Review 3, 279-295.