Toward more research on effective practices with gifted students in general-education settings

Journal for the Education of the Gifted

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 481-496

  Ryser, Gail R ^a   Johnsen, Susan K ^a  

^a BAYLOR UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030306021     PISSN: 01623532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016235329601900406     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Callahan, C. M., & Caldwell, M. S. (1995). A practitioner's guide to evaluating programs for the gifted. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
2. Coleman, L. J. (1995). The power of specialized educational environments in the development of giftedness: The need for research on social context. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 171-176.
3. Ellis, A., & Fouts, J. (1993). Research on educational innovations. Princeton Junction, NJ: Eye on Education.
4. Fetterman, D. (1993). Evaluate yourself. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
5. Flanders, N, A. (1970). Analyzing teacher behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Welsley.
6. Friedman, R. C., & Lee, S. W. (1996). Differentiating instruction for high-achieving/gifted children in regular classrooms: A field test of three gifted-education models. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 405-436.
7. Fullan, M., & Miles, M. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 744-752.
8. Gallagher, J. J. (1994). A retrospective view: The Javits program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 95-96.
9. Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
10. Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1986). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando: Academic Press.
11. Hall, G. E., George, A. A., & Rutherford, W. L. (1986). Measuring stages of concern about the innovation. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
12. Hansen, J. B., & Linden, K. W. (1990). Selecting instruments for identifying gifted and talented students. Roeper Review, 13(1), 10-15.
13. House, E. R., & Lapan, S. (1994). Evaluation of programs for disadvantaged gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17, 441-466.
14. Johnsen, S. K. (1992). Classroom Instructional Practices Scale. (Unpublished instrument available from author.)
15. Johnsen, S. K., Haensly, P. A., & Ryser, G. R. (1993). Project mustard seed. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
16. Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
17. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 73-77.
18. Maker, C. J., Rogers, J. A., Nielson, A. B., & Bauerle, P. R. (1996). Multiple intelligences, problem solving, and diversity in the general classroom. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 437-460.
19. Rogers, K. B. (1989). A content analysis of the literature on giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 78-88.
20. Sarason, S. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it is too late? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Southern, W. T., & Jones, E. D. (1991). The academic acceleration of gifted children. New York: Teachers College Press.
22. U.S. Department of Education. (1994). Javits gifted and talented students education program: Grant projects 1992/1993 (OERI Publication No. PIP 99-1223). Washington, DC: Author.
23. VanTassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D. T., Hughes, C., & Boyce, L. N. (1996). A study of language arts curriculum effectiveness with gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 461-480.