Computer-assisted instruction as a supplement to lectures in an introductory psychology class

Teaching of Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 175-181

  Worthington, Everett L ^a   Welsh, Josephine A ^b   Archer, C Ray ^b   Mindes, Erica J ^b   Forsyth, Donelson R ^b  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030305391     PISSN: 00986283     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009862839602300311     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1993). Evaluating information technology in teaching and learning. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 233-237.
2. Chute, D. L. (1986). MacLaboratory for psychology: General experimental psychology with Apple's Macintosh. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18, 205-209.
3. Conn, G., Stafiniak, P., DiPasquale, M. C., & Harper, L. (1988). Effects of teaching an introductory psychology laboratory using a computerized research tool. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 184-187.
4. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation, design, and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
5. Cordell, B. J. (1991). A study of learning styles and computer-assisted instruction. Computers & Education, 16, 175-183.
6. Deutsch, M., & Krauss, R. M. (1960). The effect of threat upon interpersonal bargaining. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychoogy, 61, 181-189.
7. Duncan, N. C. (1991). CAI-enhanced exam performance in a research design course. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 23, 324-327.
8. Duncan, N. C. (1993). Evaluation of instructional software: Design considerations and recommendations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 223-227.
9. Goolkasian, P. (1989). Computerized laboratories for psychology instruction: How successful are they? Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 21, 148-150.
10. Hannafin, M. J., & Carney, B. W. (1991). Effects of elaboration strategies on learning and depth of processing during computer-based instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18, 77-82.
11. Isaacs, M., Costenbader, V., Reading-Brown, M., & Goodman, G. (1992). Using a computer simulation in research, training, and evaluation of school psychologists. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24, 165-168.
12. Kulik, C. L. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 75-94.
13. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1987). Review of recent research literature on computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, 222-230.
14. Lambert, M. E., & Lenthall, G. (1989). Effects of psychology courseware use on computer anxiety in students. Computers in Human Behavior, 5, 207-214.
15. Liefeld, J. P., & Herrmann, T. F. (1990). Learning consequences for university students using computerized mastery testing. Educational Technology, Research & Development, 38, 19-25.
16. Ludwig, T. (1986). Program diskette for PsychSim: Interactive graphic simulation for psychology. New York: Worth.
17. McNeil, B. J., & Nelson, K. R. (1991). Meta-analysis of interactive video instruction: A 10-year review of achievement effects. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18, 1-6.
18. Monahan, J. S. (1993). A computer lab for undergraduate psychological research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 295-297.
19. Myers, D. G. (1992). Psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Worth.
20. Niemiec, R., & Walberg, H. J. (1987). Comparative effects of computer-assisted instruction: A synthesis of reviews. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 19-37.
21. Perone, M. (1991). Computer-based methodology laboratories: An undergraduate course in experimental psychology. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 23, 121-126.
22. Petty, L. C., & Rosen, E. F. (1990). Increase in mastery level using a computer-based tutorial/simulation in experimental psychology. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22, 216-218.
23. Ransdell, S. E. (1990). Using a real-time replay of students' word processing to understand and promote better writing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22, 142-144.
24. Ransdell, S. (1993). Educational software evaluation research: Balancing internal, external, and ecological validity. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 228-232.
25. Sawyer, T. A. (1988). The effects of computerized and conventional study guides on achievement in college students. Journal of Computer-Based instruction, 15, 80-82.
26. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 74(Whole No. 498).
27. Tobias, S. (1987). Learner characteristics. In R. Gagne (Ed.), Instructional technology: Foundations (pp. 207-231). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
28. Trowbridge, D. (1987). An investigation of groups working at the computer. In D. E. Berger, K. Pezdek, & W. Banks (Eds.), Applications of cognitive psychology: Problem solving, education and computing (pp. 47-57). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29. Underwood, G., & Underwood, J. D. M. (1987). The computer in education: A force for change? In F. Blacker & D. Osborne (Eds.), Information technology and people: Designing for the future (pp. 167-190). Letchworth, England: British Psychological Society.
30. Welsh, J. A., & Null, C. H. (1991). The effects of computer-based instruction on college students' comprehension of classic research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 23, 301-305.