Correlates of territoriality in rutting red deer

Ethology

Volumn 102, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 793-805

  Carranza, Juan ^a   Fernandez Llario, Pedro ^b   Gomendio, Montserrat ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEMALE DEFENCE; MATING STRATEGY; RED DEER; RUTTING; TERRITORIALITY;

SPAIN;

CERVUS ELAPHUS;

EID: 0030303385     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1996.tb01201.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. ALLIER, C., GONZALEZ, F. & RAMIREZ, L. 1974: Mapa Ecológico/Ecological Map. Reserva Biológica de Doñana. Estac. Biol. de Doñana, Sevilla.
2. ALTMANN, J. 1974: Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49, 227-267.
3. ALVAREZ, F., BRAZA, F. & SAN JOSE, C. 1990: Coexistence of territoriality and harem-defense in a rutting fallow deer population. J. Mammal. 71, 692-695.
4. APOLLONIO, M., 1989: Lekking in fallow deer: just a matter of density? Ethol. EcoL Evol. 3, 291-294.
5. _, FESTA-BIANCHET, M. & MARI, F., 1989: Correlates of copulatory success in a fallow deer lek. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25, 89-97.
6. _, _, _, MATTIOLI, S. & SARNO, B. 1992: To lek or not to lek: mating strategies of male fallow deer. Behav. Ecol. 3, 25-31.
7. _, _, _ & RIVA, M. 1990: Site-specific asymmetries in male copulatoty success in a fallow deer lek. Anim. Behav. 39, 205-212.
8. BALMFORD, A., ROSSER, A. M. & ALBON, S. D. 1992: Correlates of female choice in resource-defending antelope. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31, 107-114.
9. BRAMLEY, P. S. 1970: Territoriality and reproductive activity in roe deer. J. Reprod. Fert. Suppl. 11, 43-70.
10. CAREY, P. W. 1991: Resource-defense polygyny and male territory quality in the New Zealand fur seal. Ethology 88, 63-79.
11. CARRANZA, J. 1984: Organización y estructura, diferenciación de comportamientos y configuración espacial, en el sistema social del ciervo (Cervus elaphus L.). PhD thesis, Univ. of Extremadura, Cáceres.
12. _ 1992: Lekking in red deer? - A comment on the concept of lek. Etologia 2, 83-90.
13. _ 1995: Female attraction by males versus sites in territorial rutting red deer. Anim. Behav. 50, 445-453.
14. _, ALVAREZ, F. & REDONDO, T. 1990: Territoriality as a mating strategy in red deer. Anim. Behav. 40, 79-88.
15. _, GARCIA-MUǸOZ, J. & VARGAS, J. D. 1995: Experimental shifting from harem defence to territoriality in rutting red deer. Anim. Behav. 49, 551-554.
16. _, HIDALGO, S. J., MEDINA, R., VALENCIA, J. & DELGADO, J. 1991: Space use by red deer in a Mediterranean ecosystem as determined by radio-tracking Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 30, 363-371.
17. CARTAR, R. V. 1988: The mating system of the buff-breasted sandpiper: tekking and resource defence polygyny. Omis Scand. 19, 74-76.
18. CLUTTON-BROCK, T. H. 1989: Mammalian mating systems. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 236, 339-372.
19. _, GREEN, D., HIRAIWA-HASEGAWA, M. & ALBON, S. D. 1988: Passing the buck: resource defence, lek breeding and mate choice in fallow deer. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23, 281-296.
20. _, GUINNESS, F. E. & ALBON, S. D. 1982: Red Deer. Behaviour and Ecology of Two Sexes. Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh.
21. DAVIES, N. B. 1991: Mating systems. In: Behavioural Ecology (KREBS, J.R. & DAVIES, N.B., eds). Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford, pp. 263-294.
22. DEUTSCH, J. & WEEKS, P. 1992: Uganda kob prefer high-visibility leks and territories. Behav. Ecol. 3, 223-233.
23. DUNBAR, R. I. M. & ROBERTS, S C 1992: Territory quality in mountain reedbuck (Redunca fulvorufula chanlery): distance to safety. Ethology 90, 134-142.
24. EMLEN, S. T. & ORING, L. W. 1977: Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197, 215-223.
25. GEIST, V. 1982: Adaptive behavioural strategies. In: Elk of North America (THOMAS, J. W. & TOWEILL, D. E., eds). Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, pp. 219-277.
26. GIBSON, R. M. & GUINNESS, F. E. 1980: Behavioural factors affecting male reproductive success in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Anim. Behav. 28, 1163-1174.
27. GOSLING, L. M. 1986: The evolution of mating strategies in male antelopes. In: Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution (RUBENSTEIN, D. I. & WRANGHAM, R. W., eds). Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton. pp. 244-281.
28. _ 1991: The alternative mating strategies of male topi, Damaliscus lunatus. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 29, 107-119.
29. _ & PETRIE, M. 1990: Lekking in topi: a consequence of satellite behaviour by small males at hotspots. Anim. Behav. 40, 272-287.
30. GRAF, W. 1956: Territorialism in deer. J. Mammal. 37, 165-170.
31. HOWARD, R. D. 1978: The influence of male-defended oviposition sites on early embryo mortality in bullfrogs. Ecology 59, 789-798.
32. KITCHEN, D. W. 1974: Social behaviour and ecology of the pronghorn. Wildl. Monogr. 38.
33. KURT, F. 1968: Das Sozialverhalten des Rehes. Eine Feldstudie. Parey Verl., Berlin.
34. LANGBEIN, J. & THIRGOOD, S. J. 1989: Variation in mating systems of fallow deer (Dama dama) in relation to ecology. Ethology 83, 195-214.
35. LEADER-WILLIAMS, N. 1989: Ecology and behaviour of reindeer in South Georgia. PhD thesis, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge.
36. LEUTHOLD, W. 1966: Variations in territorial behaviour of Uganda kob Adenota kob thomast (Neumann 1896). Behaviour 27, 215-258.
37. LOTT, D. F. 1984: Intraspecific variation in the social systems of wild vertebrates. Behaviour 88, 266-325.
38. MARTIN, P. & BATESON, P. 1986: Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
39. MICHENER, G. R. 1979: Spatial relationships and social organization of adult Richardson's ground squirrel. Can. J. Zool. 57, 125-139.
40. MIURA, S. 1984: Social behaviour and territoriality in male sika deer (Cervus nippon Temminck 1838) during the rut. Z. Tierpsychol. 64, 33-73.
41. OLEA, L., PAREDES, J. & VERDASCO, M. P. 1991: Características y producción de los pastos de las dehesas del S.O. de la Peninsula Ibérica. Pastos 20-21, 131-156.
42. OWEN-SMITH, N. H. 1975: The social ethology of the white rhinoceros Ceratotherium simum (Burchell 1917). Z. Tierpsychol. 38, 337-384.
43. PEMBERTON, J. M., ALBON, S. D., GUINNESS, F. E., CLUTTON-BROCK, T. H. & DOVER, G. A. 1992: Behavioral estimates of male mating success tested by DNA fingerprinting in a polygynous mammal. Behav. Ecol. 3, 66-75.
44. RICE, W. R. 1989: Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43, 223-225.
45. ROGERS, P. M. & MYERS, K. 1980: Animal distributions, landscape classification and wildlife management, Coto Doñana, Spain. J. Appl. Ecol. 17, 545-565.
46. ROSSER, A. M. 1987: Resource defence in an African antelope, the puku Kobus vardom. PhD thesis, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge.
47. RUBENSTEIN, D. I. 1986: Ecology and sociality in horses and zebras. In: Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution (RUBENSTEIN, D.I. & WRANGHAM, R.W., eds). Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton. pp. 282-302.
48. SPINAGE, C. A. 1982: A Territorial Antelope: The Uganda Watetbuck. Acad Press, London.
49. THIRGOOD, S. J. 1990: Alternative mating strategies and reproductive success in fallow deer. Behaviour 116, 1-10.