Predicting rare orchid (small whorled pogonia) habitat using GIS

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 62, Issue 11, 1996, Pages 1269-1279

  Sperduto, Molly B ^a,b   Congalton, Russell G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^b U S FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDANGERED PLANT; GIS; HABITAT PREDICTION; ISOTRIA MEDEOLOIDES; ORCHID HABITAT; OVERLAY MODEL; SMALL WHORLED POGONIA;

USA, MAINE; USA, NEW HAMPSHIRE;

ISOTRIA MEDEOLOIDES; ORCHIDACEAE;

EID: 0030302934     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Agee, J.K., S.C.F. Stitt, M. Nyquist, and R. Root, 1989. A geographic analysis of historical grizzly bear sightings in the North Cascades, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 55: 1637-1642.
2. Brackley, F.E., 1985. The orchids of New Hampshire, Rhodora, 87:1-115.
3. Brackley-Tolman, F.E., 1991. 1991 Census of Isntria medeoloides for the State of New Hampshire, unpublished report. The New Hampshire Natural Heritage Inventory, Department of Resources and Economic Development, Concord, New Hampshire, 33 p.
4. Breininger, D.R., M.J. Provancha, and R.B. Smith, 1991. Mapping Florida scrub jay habitat for purposes of land-use management, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 57:1467-1474.
5. Brumback, W.E., and C.W. Fyler, 1983. Monitoring Study of Isotria medeoloides in East Alton, New Hampshire, unpublished report, New England Wildflower Society, Inc., Framingham, Massachusetts, 23 p.
6. _, 1988. Monitoring of Isotria medeoloides in New Hampshire, Wild Flower Notes, 3:32-40, New England Wild Flower Society, Inc., Framingham, Massachusetts.
7. Campbell, J.B., 1987. Introduction to Remote Sensing, The Guilford Press, New York, N.Y., 551 p.
8. Carter, J.R., 1988. Digital representations of topographic surfaces, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 54:1577-1580.
9. Cherrill, A.J., C. McClean, P. Watson, K. Tucker, S. P. Rushton, and R. Sanderson, 1995. Predicting the distributions of plant species at the regional scale: A hierarchical matrix model, Landscape Ecology, 10:197-207.
10. Clark, J.D., J.E. Dunn, and K.G. Smith, 1993. A multivariate model of female black bear habitat use for a geographic information system, Journal of Wildlife Management, 57:519-526.
11. Congalton, R.G., 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 37:35-46.
12. Eames, A.E., 1926. Pogonia affinis in Maine, Rhodora, 28:31-34.
13. ERDAS, 1991. Field Guide, ERDAS Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, 394 p.
14. ESRI, 1991. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, California.
15. Gaddy, L.L., 1985. The status of Isotria medeoloides in South Carolina, prepared for the South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Columbia, South Carolina, 17 p.
16. Gagliuso, R.A., 1991. Remote sensing and GIS technologies: An example of integration in the analysis of cougar habitat utilization in Southwest Oregon, GIS Applications in Natural Resources (M. Heit and A. Sorrtreid, editors), GIS World, Inc., Fort Collins, Culorado, pp. 323-329.
17. Gleason, H.A., 1952. The New Britton and Brown Illustrated Flora of the Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada, Volume I, New York Botanical Garden, Hafner Press, New York, N.Y., 482 p.
18. Gleason, H.A., and A. Cronquist, 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, 910 p.
19. Herr, A.M., and L.P. Queen, 1993. Crane habitat evaluation using GIS and remote sensing, Photogrammetric Engineering Remote Sensing, 59:1531-1538.
20. Horton, R.E., 1932. Drainage-basin characteristics, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 13:350-361.
21. Hutchinson, B., C. Duchesne, and H. Schryver, 1992. GIS analysis of habitat use by Massasauga rattlesnakes in Bruce Peninsula National Park, Proceedings of GIS '92, 3-8 August 1992, Washington, D.C., American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing and American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 416-420.
22. Lauver, C.L., and J.L. Whistler, 1993. A hierarchical classification of Landsat TM imagery to identify natural grassland areas and rare species habitat, Photogrammetric Engineering Remote Sensing, 59:627-634.
23. Luer, C.A., 1975. The Native Orchids of the United States and Canada, Excluding Florida, New York Botanical Garden, New York, N.Y., 361 p.
24. Mehrhoff, L.A., 1989. Reproductive vigor and environmental factors in populations of an endangered North American orchid, Isotria medeoloides (Pursh) Rafinesque, Biological Conservation, 47: 281-296.
25. Murphy, D.D., 1988. Challenges to biological diversity in urban areas, Biodiversity (E.O. Wilson, editor). National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 71-76.
26. Pereira, J.M.C., and R.M. Itami, 1991. GIS-based habitat modeling using logistic multiple regression: A study of the Mt. Graham red squirrel, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 57: 1475-1486.
27. Rawinski, T.J., 1986. Element Stewardship Abstract for Isotria medeoloides, unpublished report. Eastern Heritage Task Force, The Nature Conservancy, Boston, Massachusetts, 17 p.
28. Scepan, J., F. Davis, and L.L. Blum, 1987. A geographic information system for managing California condor habitat, Proceedings of GIS '87, 26-30 October 1987, San Francisco, California, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing and American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, Falls Church, Virginia, pp. 476-486.
29. Schriever, J., 1992. Using Multi-Temporal Landsat Thematic Mapper Data to Map Forest Cover-Types in New Hampshire, M.S. thesis, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, 83 p.
30. Sperduto, M., 1993. Use of a Geographic Information System (GIS) to Predict Potential Habitat for Isotria medeoloides (Pursh) Raf. in New Hampshire and Maine, M.S. thesis, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, 106 p.
31. Stenback, J.M., and R.G. Congalton, 1990. Using Thematic Mapper imagery to examine forest understory, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 56:1285-1290.
32. Stoms, D.M., F.W. Davis, and C.B. Cogan, 1992. Sensitivity of wildlife habitat models to uncertainties in GIS data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 58:843-850.
33. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1977. Soil Survey of Carroll County, New Hampshire, Document # A57.38:C2318, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
34. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1980. Endangered and threatened plants; proposed rule to determine Isotria medeoloides to be an Endangered species, Federal Register, 45:59910-59914.
35. _, 1982. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of Isotria medeoloides (Small Whorled Pogonia) to be an endangered species, Federal Register, 47:39827-39831.
36. _, 1992. Small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) Recovery Plan, First Revision, Technical/Agency Draft, Newton Corner, Massachusetts, 68 p.
37. Vitt, P., 1991. Conservation of Isotria medeoloides: A Federally Endangered Terrestrial Orchid, M.S. thesis, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, 40 p.
38. Ware, D.M., 1987. Quantitative Analysis of Vegetation, Canopy Cover, and Decaying Matter in the Habitat of Isotria medeoloides and I. verticillata in Virginia (1986 Season), unpublished report SWP-DW-I-3, Virginia Dept. of Agriculture, Bureau of Plant Protection and Pesticide Regulation, Richmond, Virginia, 41 p.
39. _, 1991. Small whorled pogonia, Virginia's Endangered Species, (K. Terwilliger, coordinator), Nongame and Endangered Species Program, Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, The McDonald and Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg, Virginia, pp. 95-97.
40. Westveld, M., R.I. Ashman, H.I. Baldwin, R.P. Holdsworth, R.S. Johnson, J.H. Lambert, H.J. Lutz, L. Swain, and M. Standish, 1956. Natural forest vegetation zones of New England, Journal of Forestry, 54:332-338.
41. Wilson, E.O., 1988. The current state of biological diversity, Biodiversity (E.O. Wilson, editor), National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 3-18.