Quantification of the spatial co-occurrences of ecological boundaries

Oikos

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 51-60

  Fortin, Marie Josée ^a,b   Drapeau, Pierre ^c   Jacquez, Geoffrey M ^d  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^d BIOMEDWARE INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOREST; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; VEGETATION BOUNDARY;

CANADA, QUEBEC;

EID: 0030302137     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3545584     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Chesson, P. L. 1985. Coexistence of competitors in spatially and temporally varying environments: a look at the combined effects of different sorts of variability. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 28: 263-287.
2. Ferson, S. 1988. Are competition communities stable assemblages? - Ph.D. Dissertation. Dept of Ecology and Evolution, State Univ. of New York at Stony Brook.
3. Fortin, M.-J. 1992. Detection of ecotones: definition and scaling factors - Ph.D. Dissertation. Dept of Ecology and Evolution, State Univ. of New York at Stony Brook.
4. _ . 1994. Edge detection algorithms for two-dimensional ecological data. - Ecology 75: 956-965.
5. _ and Drapeau, P. 1995. Delineation of ecological boundaries: comparison of approaches and significance tests. - Oikos 72. 323-332.
6. Hansen, A. and di Castri, F. (eds) 1992. Landscape boundaries: consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flaws. - Springer, New York
7. Hewitt, G. M. 1988. Hybrid zones-natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 3: 158-166.
8. Holland, M. M 1988. SCOPE. MAB technical consultations on landscape boundaries: report of a SCOPE/MAB workshop on ecotones. - Biology International Special Issue 17: 47-106.
9. _ , Risser, P. G. and Naiman. R. J. 1991. Ecotones. - Chapman & Hall, New York.
10. Jacquez, G. M. 1995. The map comparison problem: tests for the overlap of geographical boundaries - Stat. Med. 14: 2343-2361.
11. Leduc, A., Drapeau, P., Bergeron, Y. and Legendre, P. 1992. Study of spatial components of forest cover using partial Mantel tests and path analysis - J. Veg. Sci. 3: 69-78.
12. Legendre, L. and Legendre, P. 1983. Numerical ecology. Developments in environmental modelling, 3. - Elsevier, Amsterdam.
13. Legendre, P and Fortin, M.-J. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. - Vegetatio 80: 107-138.
14. Manly, B. F. J. 1991. Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology. - Chapman and Hall, London.
15. Oden, N. L., Sokal, R. R., Fortin, M.-J. and Goebl, H. 1993. Categorical wombling: detecting regions of significant change in spatially located categorical variables. - Geographical Analysis 25: 315-336.
16. Upton, G. J. G. and Fingleton, B. 1985. Spatial data analysis by example. Vol. 1: Point pattern and quantitative data. - Wiley, New York.
17. van der Maarel, E. 1990. Ecotones and ecoclines are different. - J. Veg. Sci. 1: 135-138.
18. Wiens, J. A., Crawford, C. S. and Gosz, J. R. 1985. Boundary dynamics: a conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems. - Oikos 45: 421-427.