Assessment of Phaeotheca dimorphospora for biological control of the Dutch elm disease pathogens, Ophiostoma ulmi and O. novo-ulmi

Plant Pathology

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 609-617

  Bernier, L ^a   Yang, D ^a,c   Ouellette, G B ^b   Dessureault, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

^c FORINTEK CANADA CORP   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OPHIOSTOMA NOVO-ULMI; OPHIOSTOMA ULMI; PHAEOTHECA DIMORPHOSPORA; ULMACEAE; ULMUS AMERICANA;

BIOCONTROL AGENT; DUTCH ELM DISEASE; FUNGAL ANTAGONIST; FUNGAL PATHOGEN;

EID: 0030301976     PISSN: 00320862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1996.d01-161.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bernier L, Jeng RS, Hubbes M, 1983. Differentiation of aggressive and non-aggressive strains of Ceratocystis ulmi by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of intramycelial enzymes. Mycotaxon 17, 456-72.
2. Brasier CM, 1979. Dual origin of recent Dutch elm disease outbreaks in Europe. Nature 281, 78-9.
3. Brasier CM, 1987. Recent genetic changes in the Ophiostoma ulmi populations: the threat to the future of the elm. In: Wolfe MS, Caten CE, eds. Populations of Plant Pathogens, pp. 213-226. Oxford. Blackwell Scientific Publications.
4. Brasier CM, 1991. Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov., causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics. Mycopathologia 15, 151-61.
5. Brasier CM, Mehrotra MD, 1995. Ophiostoma himal-ulmi sp. nov., a new species of Dutch elm disease fungus endemic to the Himalayas. Mycological Research 99, 205-15.
6. Cuthbert RA, Barger JH, Reed PA, 1973. Formulation and application of methoxychlor for elm bark beetle control. Washington: US Forest Service Research Paper NE 283.
7. DesRochers P, 1992 Aspects biochimiques et ultrastructuraux de l'inhibition d'Ophiostoma ulmi par Phaeotheca dimorphospora sp. nov. Université Laval, PhD thesis.
8. DesRochers P, Ouellette GB, 1988. Inhibition in vitro d'Ophiostoma ulmi par un champignon deutéromycète. Naturaliste Canadien 115, 169-72.
9. DesRochers P, Ouellette GB, 1994. Phaeotheca dimorphospora sp. nov.: description et caractéristiques culturales. Canadian Journal of Botany 72, 808-17.
10. Duchesne LC, Jeng RS, Hubbes M, 1985. Accumulation of phytoalexins in Ulmus americana in response to infection by a nonaggressive and an aggressive strain of Ophiostoma ulmi. Canadian Journal of Botany 63, 678-80.
11. Duchesne LC, Jeng RS, Hubbes M, Sticklen MB, 1990. Accumulation of mansonones E and F in seedlings of Ulmus americana in response to inoculation with Ophiostoma ulmi. Trees 4, 187-90.
12. Dumas MT, Strunz GM, Hubbes M, Jeng RS, 1986. Inhibition of Ceratocystis ulmi by mansonones A, C, D, E, F and G isolated from Ulmus americana. European Journal of Forest Pathology 16, 217-22.
13. Elgersma DM, Roosier T, Scheffer RJ, 1993. Biological control of Dutch elm disease by exploiting resistance in the host. In: Sticklen MB, Sherald JL, eds. Dutch Elm Disease Research - Cellular and Molecular Approaches, pp. 188-192. New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Gibbs JN, Smith ME, 1978. Antagonism during the saprophytic phase of the life cycle of two pathogens of woody hosts, Heterobasidion annosum and Ceratocystis ulmi. Annals of Applied Biology 89, 125-8.
15. Gregory G, Lewis R, Schreiber L, Roberto N, Ichida J, Thomas J, 1986. A Pseudomonas species isolated from live oaks antagonistic to several tree pathogens. Phytopathology 76, 652-3.
16. Hintz WE, Jeng RS, Yang DQ, Hubbes M, Horgen PA, 1993. A genetic survey of the pathogenic fungus Ophiostoma ulmi across a Dutch elm disease front in Western Canada. Genome 36, 418-26.
17. Houston DR, 1991. Changes in non-aggressive and aggressive subgroups of Ophiostoma ulmi within two populations of American elms in New England. Plant Disease 75, 620-2.
18. Hubbes M, Jeng RS, 1981. Aggressiveness of Ceratocystis ulmi strains and induction of resistance in Ulmus americana. European Journal of Forest Pathology 11, 257-64.
19. Jeng RS, Alfenas AC, Hubbes M. Dumas M, 1983. Presence and accumulation of fungitoxic substances against Ceratocystis ulmi in Ulmus americana: possible relation to induced resistance. European Journal of Forest Pathology 13, 239-44.
20. Lam BS, Strobel GA, Harrison LA, Lam ST, 1987. Transposon mutagenesis and tagging of fluorescent Pseudomonas: antimycotic production is necessary for control of Dutch elm disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 84, 6447-51.
21. Lanier GN, 1987. Fungicides for Dutch elm disease: comparative evaluation of commercial products. Journal of Arboriculture 13, 189-95.
22. Marsden DH, 1952. Pruning elms affected with Dutch elm disease. Phytopathology 42, 113-4.
23. Mazzone HM, Kluck J, Dubois NR, Zerillo R, 1982. Dutch elm disease control with biological agent or their metabolites. In: Kondo ES, Hiratsuka Y, Denyer WBC, eds. Proceedings of the Dutch Elm Disease Symposium and Workshop, 1981, pp. 36-45. Winnipeg: MDNR.
24. Murdoch CW, Campana RJ, Hoch J, 1984. On the biological control of Ceratocystis ulmi with Pseudomonas fluorescens. Phytopathology 74, 805.
25. Myers DF, Strobel GA, 1983. Pseudomonas syringae as a microbial antagonist of Ceratocystis ulmi in the apoplast of American elm. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 80, 389-94.
26. Neely D, Himelick EB, 1965. Effectiveness of vapam in preventing root graft transmission of the Dutch elm disease fungus. Plant Disease Reporter 49, 106-8.
27. Nirenberg HI, 1981. A simplified method for identifying Fusarium spp. occurring on wheat. Canadian Journal of Botany 59, 1599-609.
28. O'Brien JG, Blanchette RA, Sutherland JB, 1984. Assessment of Streptomyces spp. from elms for biological control of Dutch elm disease. Plant Disease 68, 104-6.
29. Ricard JL, 1983. Field observations on the biocontrol of Dutch elm disease with Trichoderma viride pellets. European Journal of Forest Pathology 13, 60-2.
30. Richards NT, 1988. Trichothecin revisited? Mycologist 2, 123-4.
31. SAS Institute, 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th edn, Vol. 1. Carey: SAS Institute.
32. Scheffer RJ, 1983 Biological control of Dutch elm disease by Pseudomonas species. Annals of Applied Biology 103, 21-30.
33. Scheffer RJ, 1990. Mechanisms involved in biological control of Dutch elm disease. Journal of Phytopathology 130, 265-76.
34. Schreiber LR, Gregory GF, Krause CR, Ichida JM, 1988. Production, partial purification, and antimicrobial activity of a novel antibiotic produced by a Bacillus subtilis isolate from Ulmus americana. Canadian Journal of Botany 66, 2338-46.
35. Shi JL, Brasier CM, 1986. Experiments on the control of Dutch elm disease by injection of Pseudomonas species. European Journal of Forest Pathology 16, 280-92.
36. Stillwell MA, 1977 Microflora associated with elm bark beetle feeding niches suggests biological control of Dutch elm disease. Ottawa: Canadian Forestry Service; Bi-Monthly Research Notes no. 33.
37. Stipes RJ, 1975. Chemical control of Ceratocystis ulmi - an overview. In: Burdekin DA, Heybrock HM, eds. Dutch Elm Disease: Proceedings of the IUFRO Congress, 1974, pp. 1-15. Saint Paul, MN: USFS.
38. Takai S, Richards WC, 1978 Cerato-ulmin, a wilting toxin of Ceratocystis ulmi: isolation and some properties of cerato-ulmin from the culture of C. ulmi. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 91, 129-46.
39. Webber JF, 1981. A natural biological control of Dutch elm disease. Nature 292, 449-51.
40. Webber JF, Hedger JN, 1986. Comparison of interactions between Ceratocystis ulmi and elm bark saprobes in vitro and in vivo. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 86, 93-101.
41. Yang D, Bernier L, Dessureault M, 1994. Biological control of Septoria leaf spot of poplar by Phaeotheca dimorphospora. Plant Disease 78, 821-5.
42. Yang D, Bernier L, Dessureault M, 1995a. Phaeotheca dimorphospora increases Trichoderma harzianum density in soil and suppresses red pine damping-off caused by Cylindrocladium scoparium. Canadian Journal of Botany 73, 693-700.
43. Yang D, Jeng RS, Hubbes M, 1989. Mansonone accumulation in elm callus induced by elicitors of Ophiostoma ulmi, and general properties of elicitors. Canadian Journal of Botany 67, 3490-7.
44. Yang D, Laflamme G, Bernier L, Dessureault M, 1995b. The fungus Phaeotheca dimorphospora as a potential biocontrol for shoot blight caused by Gremmeniella abietina. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 17, 7-12.
45. Yang D, Plante F, Bernier L, Piché Y, Dessureault M, Laflamme G, Ouellette GB, 1993. Evaluation of a fungal antagonist, Phaeotheca dimorphospora, for biological control of tree diseases. Canadian Journal of Botany 71, 426-33