Comparison of patient-controlled sedation with either methohexitone or propofol

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 77, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 727-730

  Hamid, S K ^a   McCann, N ^a,c   McArdle, L ^b   Asbury, A J ^a  

^a WESTERN INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b GLASGOW DENTAL HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anaesthetics i.v., methohexitone; Anaesthetics i.v., propofol; Sedation, patient controlled; Surgery, oral

Indexed keywords

INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC AGENT; METHOHEXITAL; PROPOFOL; ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ADULT; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; ORAL SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ADOLESCENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HEART RATE; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEDATION;

ADULT; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; METHOHEXITAL; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROPOFOL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SELF ADMINISTRATION; SURGERY, ORAL;

EID: 0030299986     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/77.6.727     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Briemer DD. Pharmacokinetics of methohexitone following intravenous infusion in humans. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1976; 48: 643-648.
2. MacKenzie N, Grant IS. Comparison of the new emulsion formulation of propofol with methohexitone and thiopentone for induction of anaesthesia in day cases. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1985; 57: 725-731.
3. Raeder JC, Misvaer G. Comparison of propofol induction with thiopentone or methohexitone in short outpatient general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 1988; 32: 607-613.
4. Kay B, Healey TEJ. Propofol ('Diprivan') for outpatient cystoscopy: efficacy and recovery compared with althesin and methohexitone. Postgraduate Medical Journal 1985; 61: 108-114.
5. MacKenzie N, Grant I. Comparison of propofol with methohexitone in the provision of anaesthesia for surgery under regional blockade. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1985; 57: 1167-1172.
6. Corah ML Development of a dental anxiety scale. Journal of Dental Research 1969; 48: 596.
7. Craig J, Cooper GM, Sear JW. Recovery from day-case anaesthesia - comparison between methohexitone, althesin and etomidate. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1982; 54: 447-451.
8. Hickey S, Asbury AJ, Millar K. Psychomotor recovery after outpatient anaesthesia: Individual impairment may be masked by group analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1991; 66: 345-352.
9. Wilson E, David A, MacKenzie N, Grant IS. Sedation during spinal anaesthesia: comparison of propofol and midazolam. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1990; 64: 48-52.
10. Hindmarch I, Bhatti JZ. Recovery of cognitive and psychomotor function following anaesthesia. A review. In: Hindmarch I, Jones JG, Moss E, eds. Aspects of Recovery from Anaesthesia. Chichester: Wiley, 1987; 113-165.
11. Cook LB, Lockwood GG, Moore CM, Whitwam JG. True patient-controlled sedation. Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 1039-1044.
12. Rudkin GE, Osborne GA, Finn BP, Jarvis DA, Vickers D. Intra-operative patient-controlled sedation. Comparison of patient-controlled propofol with patient-controlled midazolam. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 376-381.