Value differences and abortion attitudes: A generational analysis

Journal of Social Behavior and Personality

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 289-306

  Schnell, Frauke ^a   McConatha, Jasmin Tahmaseb ^a  

^a WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030299730     PISSN: 08861641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abramson, P.R., & Inglehart, R. (1992). Generational replacement and value change in eight West European societies. British Journal of Political Science, 22, 183-228
2. Allport, G.W., Vernon, P.E., & Lindzey, G. (1951). A study of values. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
3. Converse, P.E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: Free Press.
4. Converse, P.E., & Markus, G.B. (1979). Plus ça change... The new CBS election study panel. American Political Science Review, 73, 32-49.
5. Cook, E.A. (1997). Public opinion and abortion law in the post-Webster era. In B. Norrander & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Understanding public opinion (pp. 131-149). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
6. Craig, B.H., & O'Brien, M.O. (1993). Abortion and American politics. Madisson, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
7. Davis, J.A. (1992). Changeable weather in a cooling climate atop the liberal plateau. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 261-295.
8. Feather, N.T. (1979). Value correlates of conservatism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1617-1630.
9. Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: the role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 416-440.
10. Feldman S., & Zaller, J. (1992). The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 268-307.
11. Fletcher, J.F., & Chalmers, M.C. (1989). Attitudes of Canadians toward affirmative action: Opposition, value pluralism and nonattitudes. Political Behavior, 13, 67-95.
12. Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: Norton.
13. Ginsburg, F. (1989). Contested lives: The abortion debate in an American community. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14. Gordon, L., & Mensch, I. (1962). Values of medical students at different levels of training. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 48-51.
15. Herek, G.M. (1986). The instrumentality of attitudes: Toward a neofunctional theory. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 99-144.
16. Inglehart, R. (1985). Aggregate stability and individual-level flux in mass belief systems: The levels of analysis paradox. American Political Science Review, 79, 97-116.
17. Inglehart, R. (1987). Value change in industrial societies. American Political Science Review, 81, 1289-1303.
18. Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19. Inglehart, R., & Abramson, P.R. (1994). Economic security and value change. American Political Science Review, 88, 336-354.
20. Liberman, A., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Value conflict and thought-induced attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 203-216.
21. Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to attitude change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163-204.
22. Katz, I., & Hass, R.G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
23. Luker, K. (1984). Abortion and the politics of motherhood. University of California Press.
24. Luker, K. (1985). Abortion and the meaning of life. In S. Callahan and D. Callahan (Eds.). Abortion understanding differences (pp. 25-45). New York: Plenum Press.
25. Mannheim, K. (1972). The problem of generations. In P. Altbach & R. Laufer (Eds.) The new pilgrims (pp. 64-82). New York: David McKay.
26. Mansbridge, J.J. (1986). Why we lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Philadelphia Inquirer, Regional Almanac (1995). Philadelphia, PA: Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.
28. Roe v. Wade 410 U.S. 113. 1973.
29. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
30. Rokeach, M., & Ball-Rokeach, S.J. (1989). Stability and change in American value priorities, 1968-1981. American Psychologist, 4, 775-784.
31. Sapiro, V. (1980). News from the front: Intersex and intergenerational conflict over the status of women. Western Political Quarterly, 33, 260-277.
32. Schnell, F. (1996). A value approach to the understanding of mass political attitudes on abortion. Commonwealth, 8, 25-55.
33. Schnell, F. & Terkildsen, N. (1996, September). Interest groups, the media and policy debate formation: An analysis of message structure, rhetoric, and source cues. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.
34. Schuman, H., & Scott, J. (1989). Generations and collective memories. American Sociological Review, 54, 359-381.
35. Scott, W.A. (1969). Attitude measurement. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 204-274). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
36. Sears, D.O., & Gahart, M.T. (1980). The stability of racial prejudice and other symbolic attitudes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, Canada.
37. Smith, M.B., Bruner, J.S., & White, R.W. (1956). Opinions and personality. New York: Wiley.
38. Tatalovich, R., & Daynes, B.W. (1981). The politics of abortion: A study of community conflict in public policy making. New York: Praeger Publishers.
39. Terkildsen, N. & Schnell, F. (1996, April). How media frames move public opinion: An analysis of the women's movement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
40. Tetlock, P.E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 819-827.
41. Yankelovich, D. (1994). How changes in the economy are reshaping American values. In H.J. Aaron, T.E. Mann, & T. Taylor (Eds.), Values and Public Policy (pp. 16-53). Washington, DC: Brookings.