Need for cognition and thought-induced attitude polarization: Another look

Journal of Social Behavior and Personality

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 647-665

  Lassiter, G Daniel ^a   Apple, Kevin J ^a   Slaw, R David ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030299707     PISSN: 08861641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ahlering, R.F. (1987). Need for cognition, attitudes, and the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 100-102.
2. Cacioppo, J.T., & Petty, R.E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. In T. Merluzzi, C. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 309-342). New York: Guilford.
3. Cacioppo, J.T., & Petty, R.E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
4. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Feinstein, J., & Jarvis, B. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals low versus high in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
5. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., & Kao, C.F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
6. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Kao, C.F., & Rodriguez, R. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032-1043.
7. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., & Morris, K.J. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805-818.
8. Condra, M.B. (1992). The link between need for cognition and political interest, involvement, and media usage. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 29, 13-18.
9. Chaiken, S., & Yates, S.M. (1985). Affective-cognitive consistency and thought-induced attitude polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1470-1481.
10. Downing, J.W., Judd, C.M., & Brauer, M. (1992). Effects of repeated expressions on attitude extremity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 17-29.
11. Hastie, R. (1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 44-56.
12. Kassin, S.M., Reddy, M.E., & Tulloch, W.F. (1990). Juror interpretations of ambiguous evidence: The need for cognition, presentation order, and persuasion. Law and Human behavior, 14, 43-55.
13. Lassiter, G.D., Briggs, M.A., & Bowman, R.E. (1991). Need for cognition and the perception of ongoing behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 156-160.
14. Lassiter, G.D., Briggs, M.A., & Slaw, R.D. (1991). Need for cognition, causal processing, and memory for behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 694-700.
15. Leone, C. (1989). Self-generated attitude change: Some effects of thought and dogmatism on attitude polarization. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1243-1252.
16. Leone, C., & Ensley, E. (1986). Self-generated attitude change: A person by situation analysis of attitude polarization and attenuation. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 434-446.
17. Leone, C., Taylor, L.W., & Adams, K.C. (1991). Self-generated attitude change: Some effects of thought, dogmatism, and reality constraints. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 233-240.
18. Liberman, A., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Value conflict and thought-induced attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 203-216.
19. Martin, L.L., Ward, D.W., Achee, J.W., & Wyer, R.S. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 317-326.
20. Millar, M.G., & Tesser, A. (1986). Thought-induced attitude change: The effects of schema structure and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 259-269.
21. Orne, M.T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776-783.
22. Petty, R.E., & Jarvis, B.G. (1996). Individual difference perspective on assessing cognitive responses. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research (pp. 221-257). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Smith, S.M., Haugtvedt, C.P., Petty, R.E. (1994). Need for cognition and the effects of repeated expression on attitude accessibility and extremity. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 234-237.
24. Stayman, D.M., & Kardes, F.R. (1992). Spontaneous inference processes in advertising: Effect of need for cognition and self-monitoring on inference generation and utilization. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 125-142.
25. Tesser, A. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 289-338). New York: Academic Press.
26. Tesser, A., & Conlee, M.C. (1975). Some effects of time and thought on attitude polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 262-270.
27. Tesser, A., & Cowan, C.L. (1977). Some attitudinal and cognitive consequences of thought. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 216-226.
28. Tesser, A., & Danheiser, P. (1978). Anticipated relationship, salience of partner, and attitude change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 35-38.
29. Tesser, A., & Leone, C. (1977). Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 340-356.
30. Tesser, A., Martin, L., & Mendolia, M. (1995). The impact of thought on attitude extremity and attitude-behavior consistency. In R.E. Petty & J.A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 73-92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Wolfe, R.N., & Grosch, J.W. (1990). Personality correlates of confidence in one's decisions. Journal of Personality, 58, 515-534.