The water-level task: An intriguing puzzle

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 171-177

  Vasta, Ross ^a   Liben, Lynn S ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030299530     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512379     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Annett, M. (1994). Handedness as a continuous variable with dextral shift: Sex, generation and family handedness in subgroups of left and right handers. Behavioral Genetics, 24, 51-63.
2. Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1995). Environmental input to the development of sex-related differences in spatial and mathematical ability. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 363-379.
3. Casey, M.B. (1996). Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: A nature/nurture interactionist framework. Developmental Review, 16, 240-261.
4. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
5. Collaer, M.L., & Hines, M. (1995). Human behavioral sex differences: A role for gonadal hormones during early development? Psychological Bulletin, 118, 55-107.
6. Coren, S., & Hoy, V.S. (1986). An orientation illusion analog to the rod and frame: Relational effects in the magnitude of distortion. Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 159-163.
7. Downs, R.M., & Liben, L.S. (1991). The development of expertise in geography: A cognitive-developmental approach to geographic education. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81, 304-327.
8. Liben, L.S. (1978). Performance on Piagetian spatial tasks as a function of sex, field dependence, and training. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 24, 97-110.
9. Liben, L.S. (1991). Adults' performance on horizontality tasks: Conflicting frames of reference. Developmental Psychology, 27, 285-294.
10. Liben, L.S., & Golbeck, S.L. (1984). Performance on Piagetian horizontality and verticality tasks: Sex-related differences in knowledge of relevant physical phenomena. Developmental Psychology, 20, 595-606.
11. Liben, L.S., & Golbeck, S.L. (1986). Adults' demonstration of underlying Euclidean concepts in relation to task context. Developmental Psychology, 22, 487-490.
12. Liben, L.S., & Stern, R.M. (1996, November). Water-level task performance and susceptibility to visually-induced motion sickness. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
13. Linn, M.C., & Petersen, A.C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.
14. McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 248, 122-130.
15. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child's conception of space (F.J. Langdon & J.L. Lunzer, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1948)
16. Rebelsky, F. (1964). Adult perception of the horizontal. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 19, 371-374.
17. Robert, M., & Harel, F. (1996). The gender difference in orienting liquid surfaces and plumb lines: Its robustness, its correlates, and the associated knowledge of simple physics. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 280-314.
18. Robert, M., & Morin, P. (1993). Gender differences in horizontaliry and verticality representation in relation to initial position of the stimuli. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 507-522.
19. Sherman, J. (1978). Sex-related cognitive differences. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
20. Sholl, M.J. (1989). The relation between horizontality and rod-and-frame and vestibular navigational performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 110-125.
21. Sholl, M.J., & Liben, L.S. (1995). Illusory tilt and Euclidean schemes as factors in performance on the water-level task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1624-1638.
22. Thomas, H., & Jamison, W. (1981). A test of the X-linked genetic hypothesis for sex differences on Piaget's water-level task. Developmental Review, 1, 274-283.
23. Thomas, H., & Lohaus, A. (1993). Modeling growth and individual differences in spatial tasks. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(9, Serial No. 237).
24. Vasta, R. (1994, June). Do adults perceive tilted bottles on the water-level task as rotated? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.
25. Vasta, R., Belongia, C., & Ribble, C. (1994). Investigating the orientation effect on the water-level task: Who? When? and Why? Developmental Psychology, 30, 893-904.
26. Vasta, R., Knott, J.A., & Gaze, C.E. (1996). Can spatial training erase the gender differences on the water-level task? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 549-567.
27. Vasta, R., Lightfoot, C., & Cox, B.D. (1993). Understanding gender differences on the water-level problem: The role of spatial perception. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 391-414.
28. Vasta, R., Rosenberg, D., Knott, J.A., & Gaze, C.E. (in press). Experience and the water-level task revisited: Does expertise exact a price? Psychological Science.
29. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M.P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250-270.
30. Witkin, H.A., & Goodenough, D.R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins. New York: International Universities Press.