Limitations of bioassays for monitoring forest soil productivity: Rationale and example

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 1674-1678

  Burger, James A ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PINUS TAEDA;

BIOASSAY; FOREST PRODUCTIVITY; FOREST SOIL; METHOD LIMITATION; MONITORING; PRODUCTIVITY; ROTATION; SOIL PRODUCTIVITY; SOIL QUALITY; SOIL SUSTAINABILITY;

USA, (SOUTHEAST);

EID: 0030299416     PISSN: 03615995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000060010x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Amateis, R. L., and H. E. Burkhart. 1985. Site index curves for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations on cut-over site-prepared lands. South. J. Appl. For. 9:166-169.
2. Boul, S. W. (ed.). 1973. Soils of southern states and Puerto Rico. South. Coop. Ser. Bull. 174. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.
3. Braun, E.L. 1950. Deciduous forests of eastern North America. McGraw-Hill, New York.
4. Burger, J.A. 1994. Cumulative effects of silvicultural technology on sustained forest productivity. p. 59-70. In M.K. Mahendrappa et al. (ed.) Canadian For. Serv. Maritimes Region Inf. Rep. M-X-191E.
5. Doran, J.W., D.C. Coleman, D.F. Bezdicek, and B.A. Stewart (ed.). 1994. Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA Special Publ. 35. ASA, Madison, WI.
6. Doran, J.W., and T.B. Parkin. 1994. Defining and assessing soil quality. p. 3-21. In J.W. Doran et al. (ed.) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA Spec. Publ. 35. SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI.
7. Dyck, W.J., and M.F. Skinner. 1990. Potential for productivity decline in New Zealand radiata pine forests. p. 318-332. In S.P. Gessel et al. (ed.) Sustained productivity of forest soils. Proc. N. Am. For. Soils Conf. 7th, Vancouver, BC. 24-28 July 1988. Univ. of British Columbia, Faculty of Forestry Publ., Vancouver, BC.
8. Hasenauer, H., H.E. Burkhart, and H. Sterba. 1994. Variation in potential volume yield of loblolly pine plantations. For. Sci. 40: 1-4.
9. Hauser, J.W., W.M. Aust, J.A. Burger, and S.M. Zedaker. 1993. Drainage effects on plant diversity and productivity in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations on wet flats. For. Ecol. and Manage. 61:109-126.
10. Lal, R., and F.J. Pierce. 1991. The vanishing resource, p. 1-5. In R. Lal and F.J. Pierce (ed.) Soil management for sustainability. Soil and Water Conserv. Soc., Ankeny, IA.
11. Langdon, O.G. 1976. Study of effects of clearcutting, drainage, and bedding of poorly-drained sites on water table levels and on the growth of loblolly pine seedlings: Union Camp drainage study progress report. USDA For. Serv. Rep. SE. Southeast. For. Exp. Stn., Asheville, NC.
12. Martin, W.H., and S.G. Boyce. 1993. Introduction: The southeastern setting. p. 1-46. In W.H. Martin et al. (ed.) Biodiversity of the southeastern United States: Lowland terrestrial communities. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
13. Morris, L. A., and R.E. Miller. 1994. Evidence for long-term productivity change as provided by field trials. p. 41-80. In W.J. Dyck et al. (ed.) Impacts of forest harvesting on long-term site productivity. Chapman and Hall, New York.
14. Page, A.L., R.H. Miller, and D.R. Keeney (ed.). 1982. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.
15. Verhulst, P.F. 1845. Recherches mathématiques sur la loi d'accroisement de la population. Nouv. Mem. Acad. R. Sci. Belle-Lett. Bruxelles 18:1-38.