Controlled trial of Biocol versus Jelonet on donor sites

Burns

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 1996, Pages 557-559

  Ebbehoj, J ^d   Gavrilyuk, B K ^a   Menzul, V A ^b   Paklin, E L ^a   Rochev, Yu A ^c  

^a BIOCOL Ltd   (Russian Federation)

^b Moscow Regl Children Burns Center   (Russian Federation)

^c INSTITUTE OF THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BIOPHYSICS   (Russian Federation)

^d NONE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

JELONET; LATEX;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BURN; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DONOR SITE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; TIME; WOUND DRESSING; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 0030298292     PISSN: 03054179     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0305-4179(96)00021-6     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. 1 Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelialization of superficial wounds of the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature 1962; 193: 293-294.
2. 2 Davies JWL. Synthetic materials for covering burn wounds. Progress towards perfection. Part I. Short term materials. Burns 1984; 10: 94-103.
3. 3 Hermans MH, Hermans RP. Duoderm, an alternative dressing for smaller burns. Burns 1986; 12: 214-219.
4. 4 Alvarez OM, Mertz PM, Eaglestein WH. The effect of occlusive dressing on collagen synthesis and reepithelialization in superficial wounds. J Surg Res 1983; 35: 142-148.
5. 5 Poulsen TD, Freund KG, Arendrup K, Nyhuus P, Pederson OD. Polyurethane film (Opsite) vs. impregnated gauze (Jelonet) in the treatment of outpatient burns: a prospective, randomised study. Burns 1991; 17: 59-61.