The effect of water-soluble inhibitors from steam-pretreated willow on enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol fermentation

Enzyme and Microbial Technology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 470-476

  Palmqvist, Eva ^a   Hahn Hägerdal, Bärbel ^a   Galbe, Mats ^a   Zacchi, Guido ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Enzymatic hydrolysis; Ethanol production; Fermentation; Inhibitors; Lignocellulosic material

Indexed keywords

ENZYMES; FERMENTATION; HYDROLYSIS; STEAM; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; WOOD;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; INHIBITORY EFFECTS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC MATERIAL; NONVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; STEAM PRETREATMENT; WATER SOLUBLE INHIBITORS; WILLOW;

ETHANOL;

ALCOHOL; ENZYME INHIBITOR; LIGNOCELLULOSE; VOLATILE AGENT;

ARTICLE; ENZYME INHIBITION; FERMENTATION; HYDROLYSIS; INDUSTRY; SOLUBILITY; WATER VAPOR; WOOD;

SALIX;

EID: 0030298129     PISSN: 01410229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0229(95)00234-0     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. 1. Pourquie, J., Excoffier, G., Toussaint, B., and Vignon, M. Ethanol production by enzymic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass and fermentation of obtained sugars. Comm. Eur. Communities 1990, Rep. EUR 13,025;1-30
2. 2. Galbe, M. and Zacchi, Z. Pretreatment of sallow prior to enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 1986, 17, 97-105
3. 3. Brownell, H. H., Yu, E. K. C., and Saddler, J. N. Steam-explosion pretreatment of wood: Effect of chip size, acid, moisture content, and pressure drop. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1986, 28, 792-801
4. 4. Mes-Hartree, M. and Saddler, J. N. The nature of inhibitory materials present in pretreated lignocellulosic substrates which inhibit the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol. Lett. 1983, 5(8), 531-536
5. 5. Mandels, M. and Reese, E. T. Inhibition of cellulases and glucosidases. In: Advances in Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose (Reese, E. T., Ed.). Pergamon Press, London, 1963, 115-157
6. 6. Pampulha, M. E. and Loureiro-Dias, M. C. Combined effect of acetic acid, pH, and ethanol on intracellular pH of fermenting yeasts. Appl. Microb. Biotechnol. 1989, 31, 547-550
7. 7. Ando, S., Arai, I., Kiyoto, K., and Hanai, S. Identification of aromatic monomers in steam-exploded poplar and their influence on ethanol fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Ferment. Technol. 1986, 64(6), 567-570
8. 8. Sanchez, B. and Bautista, J. Effects of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural on the fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and biomass production from Candida guilliermondii. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1988, 10, 315-318
9. 9. Puls, J., Poutanen, K., Körner, H. U., and Viikari, L. Biotechnical utilization of wood carbohydrates after steaming pretreatment. Appl. Microb. Biotechnol. 1985, 22(6), 416-423
10. 10. Linden, T., Peetre, J., and Hahn-Hägerdal, B. Isolation and characterization of acetic acid tolerant galactose fermenting strains of S. cerevisiae from a spent-sulphite liquor fermentation plant. Appl. Env. Microb. 1992, 58(5), 166-169
11. 11. Buchert, J., Puls, J., and Poutanen, K. The use of steamed hemicellulose as substrate in microbial conversion. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1989, 20/21, 309-318
12. 12. Nishikawa, M., Sutcliffe, R., and Saddler, J. The influence of lignin degradation products on xylose fermentation Klebsiella pneumoniae. Appl. Microb. Biotechnol. 1988, 27, 549-552
13. 13. Boyer, L. J., Vega, J. L., Klasson, K. T., Clausen, E. C., and Gaddy, J. L. The effect of furfural on ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch culture. Biomass Bioenergy 1992, 3(1), 41-48
14. 14. Chung, I. S. and Lee, Y. Y. Ethanol fermentation of crude acid hydrolysate of cellulose using high-level yeast inocula. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1985, 27, 308-315
15. 15. Galbe, M. and Zacchi, G. Simulation of ethanol production processes based on enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials using ASPEN PLUS. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1991, 34, 93-104
16. 4 impregnation of willow prior to steam pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 1994, 52(3), 225-230
17. 17. Leonard, R. H. and Hajny, G. J. Fermentation of wood sugars to ethyl alcohol. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1945, 37, 390-395
18. 18. Mandels, M. and Reese, E. T. Inhibition of cellulases. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 1965, 3, 85-102
19. 19. Breuil, C., Chan, M., and Saddler, J. N. Comparison of the hydrolytic activity of commercial cellulase preparations. Appl. Microb. Biotechnol. 1990, 34, 31-35
20. 20. Holtzapple, M., Cognate, M., Shu, Y., and Hendrickson, C. Inhibition of T. reesei cellulase by sugars and solvents. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1990, 36, 275-287
21. 21. Ladisch, M. R., Kin, K. W., Voloch, M., and Tsao, G. T. Process considerations in the enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1983, 5, 82-102
22. 22. Brown, M. H. and Booth, I. R. Food Preservatives (Russel, N. J. and Gould, G. W., Eds.). Blackie and Son, London, 1991, 3
23. 23. Pampulha, M. E. and Loureiro-Dias, M. C. Activity of glucolytic enzymes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of acetic acid. Appl. Microb. Biotechnol. 1990, 34, 375-380
24. 24. Von Sivers, M., Olsson, L., Hahn-Hägerdal, B., and Zacchi, G. Cost analysis of ethanol production from willow using recombinant Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Prog. 1994, 10, 555-560