Hemodynamic effects of different pacing ratios in chronic dynamic double cardiomyoplasty

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 1380-1387

  Soltero, Ernesto R ^a   Glaeser, Donald H ^a   Michael, Lloyd H ^a   Hartley, Craig J ^a   Earle, Nan R ^a   Li, Zheng ^a   Lawrie, Gerald M ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CARDIOMYOPLASTY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEART FAILURE; HEART PACING; HEART STIMULATION; HEMODYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0030296903     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00631-5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. 1. Carpentier AF, Chachques J, Acar C, et al. Dynamic cardiomyoplasty: a seven year clinical experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:42-52.
2. 2. Moreira LF, Stolf NA, Bocchi EA, et al. Current expectations in dynamic cardiomyoplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:299-303.
3. 3. Furnary AP, Magovern JA, Christlieb IY. Clinical cardiomyoplasty: preoperative factors associated with outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:1139-43.
4. 4. Chiu RCJ. Dynamic cardiomyoplasty: efficacy and mechanisms. Cardiac Chron 1992;6:1-8.
5. 5. Grandjean PA, Austin L, Chan S, Terpstra B, Burgeois IM. Dynamic cardiomyoplasty: clinical follow-up results. J Cardiac Surg 1991;6:80-8.
6. 6. Jegaden O, Delahaye F, Finet G, et al. Late hemodynamic results after cardiomyoplasty in congestive heart failure. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:1151-7.
7. 7. Lucas CM, Van Der Veen FH, Cheriex EC, et al. Long-term follow-up (12 to 35 weeks) after dynamic cardiomyoplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:758-67.
8. 8. Kratz JM, Johnson WS, Mukherjee R, Hu J, Crawford FA, Spinale FG. The relation between latissimus dorsi skeletal muscle structure and contractile function after cardiomyoplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:868-78.
9. 9. Pattison CW, Cumming DV, Williamson E, et al. Aortic counterpulsation for up to 28 days with autologous latissimus dorsi in sheep. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102: 766-73.
10. 10. Cumming DV, Pattison CW, Lovegrove CA, et al. Biochemical and structural adaptation of autologous skeletal muscle used for counterpulsation. Int J Cardiol 1991;30:181-90.
11. 11. Lucas CM, Van Der Veen FH, Cheriex EC, van Ommen V, Penn OC, Wellens HJJ. The importance of muscle relaxation in dynamic cardiomyoplasty. PACE 1992;15:1430-6.
12. 12. Badylak SF, Stevens L, Janas W, Gray MH, Geddes LA, Voorhees WD. Cardiac assistance with electrically stimulated skeletal muscle. Med Biol Eng Comput 1989;27:159-62.
13. 13. Schreuder JJ, van der Veen FH, van der Velde ET, et al. Beat-to-beat analysis of left ventricular pressure-volume relation and stroke volume by conductance catheter and aortic modelflow in cardiomyoplasty patients. Circulation 1995;91:2010-7.
14. 14. Chekanov V. After cardiomyoplasty there is no need to stimulate the muscle with every heart contraction [Letter]. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:1370-1.
15. 15. Soltero ER, Michael LH, Glaeser DH, Hartley CJ, Earle NR, Lawrie GM. New configuration of double cardiomyoplasty based on studies of the length-tension properties of the latissimus dorsi muscle. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106: 842-9.
16. 16. Conover WJ. Practical non-parametric statistics, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley, 1980: 278-305.
17. 17. Ruggiero R, Thomas GA, Niinami H, et al. Double cardiomyoplasty: acute versus chronic effects. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:31-7.
18. 18. Van Doom CAM, Bhabra MS, Hopkinson DN, Barman D, Cranley JJ, Hooper TL. Latissimus dorsi muscle blood flow during synchronized contraction: implications for cardiomyoplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:603-9.