Enduring stereoscopic motion aftereffects induced by prolonged adaptation

Vision Research

Volumn 36, Issue 22, 1996, Pages 3655-3660

  Bowd, Christopher ^a   Rose, David ^b   Phinney, Raymond E ^a   Patterson, Robert ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Cyclopean motion; Motion adaptation; Motion aftereffect; Stereoscopic motion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRATING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0030296717     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(96)00093-4     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adelson E.H., Bergen J.R. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 2:1985;284-299.
2. Anstis, S.M. (1978) Apparent movement (pp. 655-673). In Held, R., Leibowitz, H.W. & Teuber, H.-L. (Eds), Handbook of sensory physiology (p. 8). N.Y.: Springer.
3. Anstis, S.M. (1978) Apparent movement (pp. 655-673). In Held, R., Leibowitz, H.W. & Teuber, H.-L. (Eds), Handbook of sensory physiology (p. 8). N.Y.: Springer.
4. Anstis S.M. The perception of apparent movement. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. 290:1980;153-168.
5. Braddick O.J. Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B. 290:1980;137-151.
6. Brindley, G. (1960) Physiology of the retina and visual pathways. London: Edward Arnold.
7. Cavanagh P. Short-range versus long-range motion: Not a valid distinction. Spatial Vision. 5:1991;303-309.
8. Cavanagh P. Attention-based motion perception. Science. 257:1992;1563-1565.
9. Cavanagh P., Mather G. Motion: The long and short of it. Spatial Vision. 4:1989;103-129.
10. Cormack L.K., Stevenson S.B., Schor C.M. Interocular correlation, luminance contrast, and cyclopean processing. Vision Research. 31:1991;2195-2207.
11. Fox R., Patterson R. Depth separation and lateral interference. Perception and Psychophysics. 30:1981;513-520.
12. Greenlee M.W., Georgeson M.A., Magnussen S., Harris J.P. The time course of adaptation to spatial contrast. Vision Research. 31:1991;223-236.
13. Hershenson M. Duration, time constant, and decay of the linear motion aftereffect as a function of inspection duration. Perception and Psychophysics. 45:1989;251-257.
14. Julesz, B. (1971) Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Julesz B., Payne R. Difference between monocular and binocular stroboscopic movement perception. Vision Research. 8:1968;433-444.
16. Levinson E., Sekuler R. Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion. Vision Research. 16:1976;779-781.
17. Marshak W., Sekuler R. Mutual repulsion between moving visual targets. Science. 205:1979;1399-1401.
18. Mather G., Moulden B. A simultaneous shift in apparent direction: Further evidence for a "distribution shift" model of direction coding. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 32:1980;325-333.
19. Moulden B. After effects and the integration of patterns of neural activity within a channel. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. 290:1980;39-55.
20. Nishida S., Sato T. Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing. Vision Research. 35:1995;477-490.
21. Papert S. Stereoscopic synthesis as a technique for localizing visual mechanisms. M.I.T. Quarterly Progress Report No. 73:1964;239.
22. Patterson R., Becker S. Direction-selective adaptation and simultaneous contrast induced by stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion. Vision Research. 36:1996;1773-1781.
23. Patterson R., Bowd C., Phinney R., Phondorf R., Barton-Howard W., Angilletta M. Properties of the stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion aftereffect. Vision Research. 34:1994;1139-1147.
24. Purkinje, J. (1825) Beobachtungen und Versuche zur Physiologie der Sinne. Neue Beitrage zur Kenntniss des Sehens in subjektiver Hinsicht Zweites Bändchen. Berlin: Reiner.
25. Rose D. A square root law for adaptation to contrast. Vision Research. 32:1992;1781-1784.
26. Shetty S.S., Broderson A.J., Fox R. System for generating dynamic random-element stereograms. Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation. 11:1979;485-490.
27. Sutherland N.S. Figural after effects and apparent size. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 13:1961;222-228.
28. Taylor M.M. The effect of the square root of time on continuing perceptual tasks. Perception and Psychophysics. 1:1966;113-119.
29. Wilson H.R., Humanski R. Spatial frequency adaptation and contrast gain control. Vision Research. 33:1993;1133-1149.
30. On the after effect of seen motion. British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplement, 1, 1-117.
31. Zeevi Y.Y., Geri G.A. A purely central movement aftereffect induced by binocular viewing of dynamic visual noise. Perception and Psychophysics. 38:1985;433.