Assimilation-type and contrast-type bias of motion induced by the surround in a random-dot display: Evidence for center-surround antagonism

Vision Research

Volumn 36, Issue 22, 1996, Pages 3629-3639

  Murakami, Ikuya ^a,b   Shimojo, Shinsuke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

Author keywords

Area MT; Center surround antagonism; Contrast and assimilation; Motion perception; Scaling factor

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRAST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MODEL; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; STOCHASTIC MODEL; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0030296715     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(96)00094-6     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I.A. (1965). Handbook of mathematical functions. New York: Dover Publications.
2. Albright T.D., Desimone R. Local precision of visuotopic organization in the middle temporal area (MT) of the macaque. Experimental Brain Research. 65:1987;582-592.
3. Allman J., Miezin F., McGuinness E. Direction- and velocity-specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field in the middle temporal visual area (MT). Perception. 14:1985;105-126.
4. Allman J., Miezin F., McGuinness E. Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: Neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 8:1985;407-430.
5. Anstis S.M., Reinhardt-Rutland A.H. Interactions between motion aftereffects and induced movement. Vision Research. 16:1976;1391-1394.
6. Blakemore C.B., Campbell F.W. On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. Journal of Physiology. 203:1969;237-260.
7. Born R.T., Groh J.M., Newsome W.T. Functional architecture of primate area MT probed with microstimulation: Effects on eye movements. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts. 21:1995;281.
8. Born R.T., Tootell R.B.H. Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate middle temporal visual area. Nature. 357:1992;497-499.
9. Britten K.H., Shadlen M.N., Newsome W.T., Movshon J.A. Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals. Visual Neuroscience. 10:1993;1157-1169.
10. Chang J.J., Julesz B. Cooperative phenomena in apparent movement perception of random-dot cinematograms. Vision Research. 24:1984;1781-1788.
11. Desimone R., Ungerleider L.G. Multiple visual areas in the caudal superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 248:1986;164-189.
12. Dow B.M., Snyder A.Z., Vautin R.G., Bauer R. Magnification factor and receptive field size in foveal striate cortex of the monkey. Experimental Brain Research. 44:1981;213-228.
13. Drasdo, N. (1991). Neural substrates and threshold gradients of peripheral vision. In Kulikowski, J.J., Walsh, V. & Murray, I.J. (Eds), Limits of vision (pp. 251-265). Hampshire: Macmillan Press.
14. Gattass R., Gross C.G. Visual topography of striate projection zone (MT) in posterior superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology. 46:1981;621-638.
15. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology. 195:1968;215-243.
16. Jones H.E., Grieve K.L., Sillito A.M. Spatial organisation and selectivity of the interacting components underlying responses of cells highlighting discontinuity or intersections in the visual world. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts. 21:1995;1653.
17. Komatsu H., Wurtz R.H. Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. I. Localization and visual properties of neurons Journal of Neurophysiology. 60:1988;580-603.
18. Lagae L., Gulyás B., Raiguel S., Orban G.A. Laminar analysis of motion information processing in macaque V5. Brain Research. 496:1989;361-367.
19. Levi D.M., Klein S.A., Aitsebaomo P. Detection and discrimination of the direction of motion in central and peripheral vision of normal and amblyopic observers. Vision Research. 24:1984;789-800.
20. Loomis J.M., Nakayama K. A velocity analogue of brightness contrast. Perception. 2:1973;425-428.
21. Maunsell J.H.R., Van Essen D.C. Topographic organization of the middle temporal visual area in the macaque monkey: Representational biases and the relationship to callosal connections and myeloarchitectonic boundaries. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 266:1987;535-555.
22. McKee S.P., Nakayama K. The detection of motion in the peripheral visual field. Vision Research. 24:1984;25-32.
23. Murakami I., Shimojo S. Detection threshold for motion contrast depends on cortically-scaled stimulus size, regardless of eccentricity. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 34:1993;1034.
24. Murakami I., Shimojo S. Motion capture changes to induced motion at higher luminance contrasts, smaller eccentricities, and larger inducer sizes. Vision Research. 33:1993;2091-2107.
25. Murakami I., Shimojo S. Modulation of motion aftereffect by surround motion and its dependence on eccentricity and stimulus size. Vision Research. 35:1995;1835-1844.
26. Nakayama K. Biological image motion processing: A review. Vision Research. 25:1985;625-660.
27. Nakayama K., Tyler W. Relative motion induced between stationary lines. Vision Research. 18:1978;1663-1668.
28. Nawrot M., Sekuler R. Assimilation and contrast in motion perception: Explorations in cooperativity. Vision Research. 30:1990;1439-1451.
29. Newsome W.T., Paré E.B. A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). Journal of Neuroscience. 8:1988;2201-2211.
30. Ramachandran V.S. Interaction between colour and motion in human vision. Nature. 328:1987;645-647.
31. Regan D., Beverley K.I. Figure-ground segregation by motion contrast and by luminance contrast. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 1:1984;433-442.
32. Reinhardt-Rutland A.H. Peripheral movement, induced movement, and aftereffects from induced movement. Perception. 10:1981;173-182.
33. Reinhardt-Rutland A.H. Aftereffect of induced rotation: Separation of inducing and static areas, and monocular component. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 56:1983;239-242.
34. Reinhardt-Rutland A.H. Induced movement in the visual modality: An overview. Psychological Bulletin. 103:1988;57-71.
35. Salzman C.D., Murasugi C.M., Britten K.H., Newsome W.T. Microstimulation in visual area MT: Effects on direction discrimination performance. Journal of Neuroscience. 12:1992;2331-2355.
36. Strelow E.R., Day R.H. Visual movement aftereffect: Evidence for independent adaptation to moving target and stationary surround. Vision Research. 15:1975;117-121.
37. Tanaka K., Hikosaka K., Saito H., Yukie M., Fukada Y., Iwai E. Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience. 6:1986;134-144.
38. Tanaka K., Sugita Y., Moriya M., Saito H. Analysis of object motion in the ventral part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. 69:1993;128-142.
39. Tynan P., Sekuler R. Simultaneous motion contrast: Velocity, sensitivity and depth response. Vision Research. 15:1975;1231-1238.
40. Walker P., Powell D.J. Lateral interaction between neural channels sensitive to velocity in the human visual system. Nature. 353:1974;732-733.
41. Watson A.B. Estimation of local spatial scale. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 4:1987;1579-1582.
42. Whitaker D., Rovamo J., Macveigh D., Mäkelä P. Spatial scaling of vernier acuity tasks. Vision Research. 32:1992;1481-1491.
43. Wohlgemuth A. On the after-effect of seen movement. British Journal of Psychology. 1:1911;1-117.
44. Wright M.J., Johnston A. Invariant tuning of motion aftereffect. Vision Research. 25:1985;1947-1955.