Environment and innovation: The case of the small entity

Industrial Marketing Management

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 577-587

  Erickson, G Scott ^a  

^a MARIST COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030295947     PISSN: 00198501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0019-8501(96)00063-6     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. 1. Acs, Zoltan J., and Audretsch, David B., Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis. American Economic Review 78, 678-690 (September 1988).
2. 2. The Advisory Commission on Patent Law Reform. A Report to the Secretary of Commerce, Washington, DC, August 1992.
3. 3. Amesse, Fernand, Desranleau, Claude, Etemad, Hamid, Fortier, Yves, and Seguin-Dulude, Louise, The Individual Inventor and the Role of Entrepreneurship. Research Policy 20, 251-259 (1991).
4. 4. Bowonder, B., Miyake, T., and Linstone, H.A., The Japanese Institutional Mechanisms for Industrial Growth: A Systems Perspective-Part I. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 47, 229-254 (1994).
5. 5. Bowonder, B., Miyake, T., and Linstone. H.A., The Japanese Institutional Mechanisms for Industrial Growth: A Systems Perspective-Part II. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 47, 309-344 (1994).
6. 6. The Economist, Those German Banks and Their Industrial Treasures. January 21, 1995, pp. 71-72.
7. 7. Erickson, G. Scott, International Indicators of the Quality of Technological Output. In Global Competitiveness, Proceedings of the 1994 ASC U.S. Competitiveness in the Global Marketplace Conference, Harvey Kahalas, Yash R. Puri, and Kathleen Suchow. eds., 2, 425-436 (1994).
8. 8. Erickson, G. Scott, Generating National Technological Output: The Influence of a National Patent System. Advances in Competitiveness Research 3, 86-109 (1995).
9. 9. Farrell, Christopher, Rebello, Kathy, Hof, Robert D., and Maremont, Mark, The Boom in IPO's. Business Week December 18, 1995, pp. 64-72.
10. 10. Geroski, P.A. and Pomroy, R., Innovation and the Evolution of Market Structure. Journal of Industrial Economics 38, 299-314 (March 1990).
11. 11. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Foreign Commerce and Tourism of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Senate. Effect of the Japanese Patent System on American Business. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1988.
12. 12. Hearings before the Senate Subcommittee of Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks and the House Subcommittee of Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration of the Senate and House Committees on the Judiciary on the Patent System Harmonization Act of 1992 (S.2605 and H.R.4978), Washington, DC, transcript, April 30, 1992.
13. 13. Helfgott, Samson, Cultural Differences between the U.S. and Japanese Patent Systems. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 72, 231-238 (March 1990).
14. 14. Herbig, Paul A., and Miller, Joseph C., American and Japanese Innovative Capabilities: The Effect of Culture. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 1-57(1991).
15. 15. Herbig, Paul A., and McCarty, Cynthia, National Management of Innovation: Interactions of Culture and Structure. Multinational Business Review Spring: 19-26(1993).
16. 16. Hunt, Shelby D., and Morgan, Robert M., The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition. Journal of Marketing 59, 1-15 (April 1995).
17. 17. Kastriner, Lawrence G., The Revival of Confidence in the Patent System. Journal of the Patent & Trademark Office Society 73, 5-23 (January 1991).
18. 18. Kotabe, Masaaki, A Comparative Study of U.S. and Japanese Patent Systems. Journal of international Business Studies 21, 113-130 (Spring 1992).
19. 19. Mansfield, Edwin, Industrial R&D in Japan and the United States: A Comparative Study. American Economics Association: Papers and Proceedings 78, 1157-1168 (May 1988).
20. 20. Mansfield, Edwin, The Speed and Cost of Industrial Innovation in Japan and the United States: External vs. Internal Technology. Management Science 34, 223-228 (October 1988).
21. 21. Montoya-Weiss, Mitzi M., and Calantone, Robert, Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management 11, 397-417 (1994).
22. 22. Mowery, David C., The U.S. National Innovation System: Origins and Prospects for Change. Research Policy 21, 125-143 (1992).
23. 23. Mowery, David C., and Teece, David J., Japan's Growing Capabilities in Industrial Technology: Implications for U.S. Managers and Policymakers. California Management Review 35, 9-34 (Winter 1993).
24. 24. Narin, Francis, and Frame, J. Davidson, The Growth of Japanese Science and Technology. Science 245, 600-605 (August 11, 1989).
25. 25. National Science Board, Science & Engineering Indicators - 1993. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1993.
26. 26. Nelson, Richard R., ed., Government and Technical Progress: A Cross-Industry Analysis. Pergamon Press, New York, 1982.
27. 27. Nelson, Richard R., High Technology Policies: A Five-Nation Comparison. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, DC, 1984.
28. 28. Nelson, Richard R., Capitalism as an Engine of Social Progress. Research Policy 19, 193-214 (1990).
29. 29. Nelson, Richard R., U.S. Technological Leadership: Where Did It Come From and Where Did It Go? Research Policy 19, 117-132 (1990).
30. 30. Nelson, Richard R., ed., National Innovation Systems, A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.
31. 31. Ordover, Janusz, A Patent System for Both Diffusion and Exclusion. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, 43-60, (Winter 1991).
32. 32. Patel, Pari, and Pavitt, Keith, Is Western Europe Losing the Technological Race? Research Policy 16, 59-85 (1987).
33. 33. Porter, Michael E., The Competitive Advantage of Nations. The Free Press, New York, 1990.
34. 34. Roberts, Edward B., Managing Invention and Innovation. Research-Technology Management 31, 11-29 (January/February 1988).
35. 35. Rosenberg, Nathan, Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1982.
36. 36. Rosenberg, Nathan, and Steinmueller, W. Edward, Why are Americans Such Poor Imitators? American Economics Association: Papers and Proceedings 78, 229-234 (May 1988).
37. 37. Shapiro, Amram, Responding to the Changing Patent System. Research-Technology Management 33, 38-43 (September/October 1990).
38. 38. Silverstein, David, Patents, Science and Innovation: Historical Linkages and Implications for Global Technological Competitiveness. Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Review 17, 261-319 (1991).
39. 39. Sirilli, Giorgio, Patents and Inventors: An Empirical Study. Research Policy' 16, 157-174 (1987).
40. 40. Stamm, Otto A., GATT Negotiations for the Protection of New Technologies. Journal of the Patent & Trademark Office Society 73, 680-699 (1991).
41. 41. Tong, Xuesong, and Frame, J. Davidson, Measuring National Technological Performance with Patent Claims Data. Research Policy 23, 133-141 (1994).
42. 42. Urban, Glen L., and Hauser, John R., Design and Marketing of New Products, 2nd edition. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993.
43. 43. Van de Yen, Andrew H., Central Problems in the Management of Innovation. Management Science 12, 590-607 (May 1986).
44. 44. Wiggs, Blake R., Canada's First-To-File Experience - Should the U.S. Make the Move? Journal of the Patent & Trademark Office Society 73, 493-513 (July 1991).
45. 45. Wineberg, Arthur, The Japanese Patent System: A Non-Tariff Barrier to Foreign Businesses? Journal of World Trade 22, 11-22 (February 1988).
46. 46. Winter, Sidney G., Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5, 287-320(1984).
47. 47. Woodman, Richard W., Sawyer, John E., and Griffin, Ricky W., Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. Academy of Management Journal 18, 293-321 (April 1993).