Economic values of increasingly rare and endangered fish

Fisheries

Volumn 21, Issue 11, 1996, Pages 6-10

  Loomis, John B ^a   White, Douglas S ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMADINA FASCIATA; ONCORHYNCHUS CLARKI; PTYCHOCHEILUS LUCIUS; SALMONIDAE; THYMALLUS ARCTICUS;

EID: 0030295729     PISSN: 03632415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8446(1996)021<0006:EVOIRA>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. American Fisheries Society. 1992. Investigation and valuation of fish kills. Am. Fish. Soc. Spec. Pub. 24, Bethesda, MD.
2. Arrow, K., R. Solow, P. Portney, E. Leaner, R. Radner, and H. Schuman. 1993. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register 58(10):4,602-4,614.
3. Boyle, K., and R. Bishop. 1987. Valuing wildlife in benefit-cost analysis: a case study involving endangered species. Water Resour. Res. 23(5):943-950.
4. Brookshire, D., W. Schulze, M. Thayer, and R. d'Arge. 1982. Valuing public goods: a comparison of survey and hedonic approaches. American Economic Review 72(1):165-177.
5. Carson, R., and 7 authors. 1994. Prospective interim lost use value due to DDT and PCB contamination in the Southern California bight. Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Inc., La Jolla, CA.
6. Cummings, R., P. Ganderton, and T. McGuckin. 1994. Substitution effects in CVM values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(2): 205-214.
7. Diamond, P., and J. Hausman. 1994. Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4):45-64.
8. Duffield, J., and D. Patterson. 1992. Field testing existence values: comparison of hypothetical and cash transaction values. In B. Rettig, compiler. Benefits and costs in natural resource planning, fifth interim report. W-133 Western Regional Research Publication. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
9. Hanemann, M., J. Loomis, and B. Kanninen. 1991. Statistical efficiency of double-bound dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(4):1,255-1,263.
10. Loomis, J. 1990. Comparative reliability of dichotomous choice and open-ended contingent valuation techniques. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. (18):78-85
11. -. 1993. Integrated public lands management: principles and applications to national forests, parks, wildlife refuges and Bureau of Land Management lands. Columbia University Press, New York.
12. -. 1995. Biodiversity, economic appraisal. Pages 195-200 in W. Nierenhberg, ed. Encyclopedia of environmental biology. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
13. Mitchell, R. C., and R. T. Carson. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
14. Olsen, D., J. Richards, and R. Scott. 1991. Existence and sport values for doubling the size of Columbia River basin salmon and steelhead runs. Rivers 2(1):44-56.
15. Randall, A., and J. Stoll. 1983. Existence value in a total valuation framework. Pages 265-274 in R. Rowe and L. Chestnut, eds. Managing air quality and scenic resources at national parks and wilderness areas. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
16. Stevens, T., J. Echeverria, R. Glass, Tim Hager, and Thomas More. 1991. Measuring the existence value of wildlife: What do CVM estimates really show? Land Economics 67(4):390-400.
17. U.S. Department of Interior. 1986. Natural resource damage assessment, final rule. Federal Register 51(148):27,614-27,753.
18. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993. 1991 National survey of fishing, hunting and wildlife-associated recreation. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
19. -. 1995. Facts about the Endangered Species Act. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
20. U.S. Water Resources Council. 1983. Economic and environmental principles for water and related land resources implementation studies. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
21. Welsh, M. 1986. Exploring the accuracy of the contingent valuation method: comparisons with simulated markets. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.