Unifying theories of creativity: Metaphorical thought and the unification process

New Ideas in Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 257-267

  Ambrose, Don ^a  

^a RIDER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030295251     PISSN: 0732118X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0732-118X(96)00019-0     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ambrose, D. (1992). An analysis of the interdisciplinary theory summit conferences on optimal development of mind: Effective processes and emerging syntheses. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, A3469.
2. Anbar, M. (1986). The "bridge scientist" and his role. In D. E. Chubin, A. L. Porter, F. A. Rossini & T. Connolly (Eds.), Interdisciplinary analysis and research (pp. 155-163). Mt. Airy, MD: Lomond.
3. Bella, D. A., & Williamson, K. J. (1986). Conflicts in interdisciplinary research. In D. E. Chubin, A. L. Porter, F. A. Rossini & T. Connolly (Eds.), Interdisciplinary analysis and research (pp. 347-354). Mt. Airy, MD: Lomond.
4. Bohm, D., & Peat, F. D. (1987). Science order and creativity. New York: Bantam.
5. Boyd, R. (1993). Metaphor and theory change: What is "metaphor" a metaphor for? In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 481-532). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Cohen, L. M. (1990). Toward a theory of gifted education. Paper presented at the Theory Summit Conference on Optimal Development of Mind, Mt. Hood, OR.
7. Cohen, L. M., & Ambrose, D. (1993). Theories and practices for differentiated education for the gifted and talented. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 339-363). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
8. Eisenberg, A. (1992, May). Metaphor in the language of science. Scientific American, 266, 5, 144.
9. Freud, S. (1976). Creative writers and daydreaming. In A. Rothenberg & C. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (pp. 48-54). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. (Reprinted from The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud Vol. 9, pp. 143-156, by J. Strachey, Ed., 1959, London: Hogarth Press. Original work published 1908)
10. Freud, S. (1976). Creative writers and daydreaming. In A. Rothenberg & C. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (pp. 48-54). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. (Reprinted from The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud Vol. 9, pp. 143-156, by J. Strachey, Ed., 1959, London: Hogarth Press. Original work published 1908)
11. Gardner, H. (1985). The mind's new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.
12. Gillespie, D. (1992). The mind's we: Contextualism in cognitive psychology. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
13. Goswami, A. (1988). Creativity and the quantum theory. Journal of Creative Behavior, 22, 9-31.
14. Gruber, H. E. (1989). The evolving systems approach to creative work. In D. B. Wallace & H. E. Gruber (Eds.), Creative people at work (pp. 3-24). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Hoffman, R. (1985). Some implications of metaphor for philosophy and psychology of science. In W. Paprotte & R. Dirven (Eds.), The ubiquity of metaphor (pp. 327-380). Amsterdam, PA: John Benjamins.
16. Hofstadter, D. (1995). Fluid concepts and creative analogies: Computer models of mental fluidity and creativity. New York: Basic.
17. Jung, C. G. (1976). On the relation of analytic psychology to poetic art. In A. Rothenberg & C. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (pp. 120-126). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. (Reprinted from British Journal of Medical Psychology 3, 219-231, 1923)
18. Jung, C. G. (1976). On the relation of analytic psychology to poetic art. In A. Rothenberg & C. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (pp. 120-126). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. (Reprinted from British Journal of Medical Psychology 3, 219-231, 1923)
19. Kehl, R. (Ed.) (1983). Silver departures. La Jolla, CA: Green Tiger.
20. Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Macmillan.
21. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
22. Kuhn, T. S. (1993). Metaphor in science. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 533-542). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202-251). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26. Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
27. Mednick, S. A. (1976). The associative basis of the creative process. In A. Rothenberg & C. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (pp. 227-237). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. (Reprinted from Psychological Review, 69, 220-232, 1962)
28. Mednick, S. A. (1976). The associative basis of the creative process. In A. Rothenberg & C. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (pp. 227-237). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. (Reprinted from Psychological Review, 69, 220-232, 1962)
29. Osowski, J. V. (1989). Ensembles of metaphor in the psychology of William James. In D. B. Wallace & H. E. Gruber (Eds.), Creative people at work (pp. 126-145). New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Overton, W. F. (1984). World views and their influence on psychological thoughts and research: Kuhn-Lakatos-Ladan. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 91-226). New York: Academic Press.
31. Paprotte, W., & Dirven, R. (1985). The ubiquity of metaphor. Amsterdam, PA: John Benjamins.
32. Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
33. Perkins, D. (1992). Smart schools: From training memories to educating minds. New York: Free Press.
34. Rank, O. (1932). Art and artist (C. F. Atkinson, Trans.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
35. Rogers, C. R. (1954). Toward a theory of creativity. In A. Rothenberg & C. Hausman (Eds.), The creativity question (pp. 296-305). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
36. Rubenson, D. L., & Runco, M. A. (1992). The psychoeconomic approach to creativity. New Ideas in Psychology, 10, 131-148.
37. Schön, D. A. (1993). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 137-163). New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 223-243). New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Tarnas, R. (1991). The passion of the western mind. New York: Ballantine.